While firearms have largely been a federal affair in Canada, one province is taking matters into its own hands, declaring an unfettered right to own and use guns as part of a more comprehensive Bill of Rights. The United Conservative Party (UCP) board approved the new gun rights law which was carefully crafted to deny any opportunity for intentional misinterpretation that could be used for future infringement, as has been the case with the Second Amendment in the United States. 

The origins of the new law stem from a group of UCP activists in Medicine Hat who drafted the detailed Bill of Rights for Alberta residents, a bill that also focuses heavily on COVID-era grievances and the general rights of citizens. The Medicine Hat bill, endorsed verbatim in a vote of the party’s elected board, was suggested to be representative of the UCP’s entire membership by party president, Rob Smith, lending credibility to the proposal in advance of the party’s annual convention on November 1-2. 

Crime has been on the rise in rural Alberta since the Royal Canadian Mounted Police seized guns in High River after the 2013 flood, causing residents to escalate the demand for legal rights to property and self-protection. The UCP group in Medicine Hat is demanding the “freedom to use sufficient force to defend person, family, home and property from any and all occupation, theft or destruction,” a concept that is reasonable enough to beg the question as to why any government would deprive its citizens of such a right.

Among the rights spelled out in the draft bill, number five reads, “freedom to keep and bear arms, including ownership and use of firearms,” echoing the Second Amendment in the U.S. Constitution, but eliminating any nuance in language that may be used to misrepresent its intention, attempting to close all loopholes that might threaten their rights. This lesson was learned by observing the conflict here in America, where antagonist groups pretend to have an understanding of the Second Amendment that has been proven diametrically opposed to what the Founding Fathers intended. 

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” It is clear, and any person with an elementary understanding of language and punctuation can determine this right was granted to “the people.” Regardless, America has been forced to debate its meaning, questioning if the intent is to arm an official force or “the people” as it states in plain English. The U.S. Supreme Court has, for the most part, long since sided with “the people,” but has failed to protect the right in its entirety, as is the case with the NFA and thus far allowing individual states to infringe on the right which the federal government is obligated to guarantee.

It is uncertain whether or not UCP Premiere Danielle Smith will include the gun rights measure in the government’s draft of the Bill of Rights, which focuses on property guarantees and the freedom to make choices for one’s own body, including the right to refuse vaccines and unwanted medical intervention, a human rights overhaul influenced heavily by fallout stemming from COVID-19 vaccines, mandates, and government restrictions.

“My concern with the Medicine Hat proposal is it’s just too complicated — it’s too lengthy, it’s too much legalese — If we’re going to do something like that, it needs to be simple, needs to be easy for people to read, easy to understand,” says Nadine Wellwood, who was rejected as a UCP candidate during the 2023 election and now sits as chair of the 1905 Committee, painting itself as a conservative watchdog on the Smith government.

The Full Medicine Hat Proposal:

The Rights, Freedoms and Responsibilities, which are affirmed in this Alberta Bill of Rights, Freedoms and Responsibilities are: affirmed for people in Alberta; absolute within their defined limits; expansive beyond these minimum extents; not diminished by their order of listing and, as part of the Constitution of Alberta, have supremacy over all other subordinate legislation.

1. Freedom of Religion, Belief, and Conscience;

2. The Right to Life, Liberty, Property & the Pursuit of Happiness;

3. Freedom of Speech, Expression and from Private or Public Censorship in any Form;

4. Freedom of Parents to Make Decisions Concerning the Health, Education, Welfare and Upbringing of their Children;

5. Freedom to Keep and Bear Arms, including Ownership and Use of Firearms;

6. Freedom to Keep and Own Private Property, Including Land, Livestock, and Chattels;

7. Freedom from Supervision, Surveillance, and Unreasonable Search and Seizure;

8. Freedom of Mobility, Including to Enter, to Remain, to Move about, to Leave, and to Return to Alberta;

9. Freedom to Remain Silent under Questioning, Detention, Arrest, or at Trial;

10. Freedom to Consult Legal Counsel and to be Properly Informed of Such Right;

11. Freedom to Demand Natural Justice and Procedural Fairness in all Criminal and Civil Matters; and to Demand Compensation for Denial or Infringement of Rights by a Person, a Corporation or a Government;

12. Freedom from Arbitrary Detention, to be Presumed Innocent in Criminal Proceedings, to be Provided with Full Crown Disclosure, to be Tried within a Reasonable Time;

13. Freedom to Democratically Elect and Recall Legislators by Voting through Secret Paper Ballots to be Manually Hand Counted;

14. Freedom to use Sufficient Force to Defend Person, Family, Home, and Property from Any and All Occupation, Theft, or Destruction;

15. Freedom of Informed Consent and to Make Personal Health Decisions, Including to Refuse Vaccinations, Medical or Surgical Procedures;

16. Freedom to Peacefully Assemble, Associate and Protest;

17. Freedom from Excessive Taxation, and from Taxation without Representation;

18. Freedom from Discrimination, Including upon the Basis of Diversity, Inclusion, or Equity;

19. Freedom of Access to Financial Services, to Goods and Services, and to Conduct Commerce via Bills of Exchange;

20. Freedom to Demand Independent Public Inquiry into the Conduct of Legislators, Judges, and other Government Appointed Officials;

21. Freedom to Access Government Services and Government Information; &

22. The Right of Official Languages.

As mentioned earlier, firearms have largely been a federal matter in Canada, drawing uncertainty when it comes to the impact of declaring such a provincial right. If the people of Alberta are able to pass this Bill of Rights, they will have the envy of American conservatives who would love to see the Constitution upheld as it was intended. It could also lead to a larger battle with Canada’s federal government, not too different from when state and federal laws conflict in the U.S. It is noteworthy, however, to point out that here in the US, the federal government does not seem to mind when states conflict with them by legalizing drugs or instituting sanctuary policies to protect migrants that have illegally entered the country but try to enact a state law that contradicts the federal government’s Second Amendment infringements, and you may find yourself questioning their intentions.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

18 COMMENTS

  1. Kabuki theater?

    I have no knowledge of Canada’s legal landscape if the laws of a province conflict with federal law or (gasp!) the United Kingdom/royalty.

    Even if Alberta’s constitution is superior to federal and U.K./royalty edicts, what are the chances that the populace will vote for this new change to their constitution? I suspect that urban and suburban population centers will vote NO.

    However things play out, I wish the people of Alberta well.

  2. I hope that this will pass. If I lived there I would worry that what is happening in the UK would get on a raft and cross the pond.

    I would vote for it.

    • Canada is currently the retarded little brother of England and 90% is also still owned by the British Crown. The only real difference is the current Prime Minister is the bastard son of Fidel Castro and a devout Marxist just like his daddy.

  3. And again what is missing? Anything That Defines Gun Control. The pro Gun incompetence is so pathetic I am writing my US Senator and asking for a law that mandates any pro gun or Gun Control article, ad, etc. include…

    Warning! History Confirms Gun Control in any shape, matter or form is Rooted in Racism and Genocide.

  4. “right was granted to “the people.” ”

    (Natural) Rights CAN NOT be granted by any one or any thing — they can be recognized, and they can be protected (which is the primary purpose of the first 10 amendments — read the preamble).

  5. #3 is a big one, what with all the speech control the federales are pushing. That compelled speech rot is dangerous business. Also, I noticed that they got the order correct in #18. DIE. I wish them success.

  6. “Rights” aren’t granted. Every person is born with certain inalienable rights.
    Anything “granted” by governments is called privileges.

  9. Bet of luck to the law abiding gun owners of Alberta. Looks like you will need an extra large helping thereof.

    • What happened earlier when this thread disappeared??? My comment went to the ether. Now I don’t care. Great job TTAG🙄

  10. The United States should invite Alberta to become the fifty-first state of the United States. I suspect Saskatchewan and Manitoba might also be interested in declaring their independence from Canada. While we’re at it, we could invite the Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut to join. Annexing Greenland from Denmark would also be a good idea.

Comments are closed.