AP Photo/Seth Wenig

Joe Biden lied about guns, Second Amendment rights and nearly everything else so often that even his staunchest supporters stopped taking him seriously. The country’s 46th President beclowned himself with his own falsehoods.

Biden was a classic fabulist. He invented stories and assigned himself the starring role. Whether he was singlehandedly confronting hunters armed with standard-capacity mags in a Delaware swamp, exaggerating the efficacy of the 1994 federal Assault Weapon Ban or making up colonial cannon prohibitions, Biden received more Pinocchios than Disney, which is one of the reasons why he’ll be sitting in a beach chair rather than behind the Resolute Desk for the next four years.

By comparison, Kamala Harris has been much more circumspect about her anti-gun plans, and despite her maniacal cackle, could prove a more serious opponent to our Second Amendment rights than her former boss ever imagined possible.

Last year, most likely at the insistence of Barack Obama, Biden put Harris in charge of the new White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention, which Biden said would “centralize, accelerate, and intensify our work to save more lives more quickly.”

The Office has no website. Its budget has never been made public. Its staffing levels are not known. It operates in secret, without oversight and wields tremendous power. Only three staffers were identified. One has a long association with Obama.

Almost immediately, it became clear that the Office was an incubator and a clearinghouse for anti-gun policy that it pushed out to blue states.

In December 2023, Harris hosted a gaggle of state lawmakers at the White House to showcase the Office’s new gun-control policies. The names of the attendees were not released, nor were the details of the meetings. None of the meetings were recorded or transcribed.

After overseeing the Office, Harris’ anti-gun rhetoric has sharpened, and it is clear what she has in store for law-abiding gun owners if she replaces Biden on a permanent basis.

#1 Killer Campaign

“Gun violence is the number-one case of death for children in America – think about that. Not some kind of health disease,” Harris announced Sept. 14, 2023, in a moderated conversation at Hampton University in Hampton, Virginia. “And we don’t have to be very creative to figure it out: assault weapons ban; background checks, because you might want to know before someone can buy a lethal weapon if they’re a danger to themselves or others; red flag laws. That is reasonable.”

Both Biden and Harris cited this number-one-cause-of-death fiction at a host of different venues. They still do, even though it has been soundly debunked.

When they came up with this claim, the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention cited a 2022 study by the Center for Gun Violence Solutions at Johns Hopkins University – not the most credible of sources. Researchers included adults, both 18- and 19-year-olds in their children’s study. If the adults are excluded from the data set, the leading cause of death for children is motor vehicle accidents.

Harris was undeterred by the fact checkers, which included The Washington Post. She needed guns to be the leading cause of death of children to push for more gun control. For her, the ends justified the means.

Eight days later, Harris repeated the false claim but added a label to her opponents.

“Today, however, gun violence is the number-one cause of death for children in America. But instead of protecting our children, extremists obstruct,” she said.

On Oct. 12, 2023, during a moderated conversation at the College of Southern Nevada in Las Vegas, Harris once again cited the false claim as a reason for more gun control.

“I have been working on this for a long time. And I will tell you that, again, there – there – it’s not rocket science in terms of what we need to do. Okay? But you got a bunch of feckless people who lack courage, who are in the United States Congress, who are pushing a false choice, which suggests you’re either in favor of the Second Amendment or you want to take everyone’s guns away,” she said. “And it’s a false choice.  I’m in favor of the Second Amendment, but we need an assault weapons ban. We need universal background checks. We need red flag laws.”

Harris has never stopped citing these false cause-of-death statistics. She brought them up again just two months ago at a moderated conversation at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in Washington, D.C.

“So, let’s start with the very tragic fact that gun violence is the leading cause of death for children in America – not car accidents, not cancer – gun violence. Number one cause of death for children in America right now. One in five Americans has a family member that was killed by gun violence,” she said.

National red flag campaign

The U.S. Supreme Court hinted in Caniglia v. Strom, that it may review the constitutionality of red-flag laws.

“This case also implicates another body of law that petitioner glossed over: the so-called “red flag” laws that some States are now enacting. These laws enable the police to seize guns pursuant to a court order to prevent their use for suicide or the infliction of harm on innocent persons. They typically specify the standard that must be met and the procedures that must be followed before firearms may be seized. Provisions of red flag laws may be challenged under the Fourth Amendment, and those cases may come before us. Our decision today does not address those issues,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a concurring opinion.

The White House didn’t take the hint. Last March, Harris launched the National Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) Resource Center.

“The Resource Center will assist states, local governments, law enforcement, prosecutors, attorneys, judges, clinicians, victim service providers, and behavioral health and other social service providers in optimizing the usage of red flag laws – laws that allows a family member or law enforcement to seek a court order to temporarily take away access to guns if they feel a gun owner may harm themselves or others,” according to a White House “Fact Sheet” released March 23.

The ERPO Resource Center was funded by Department of Justice grants and is operated by the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Its critics have said it is nothing more than a mechanism to bribe the states into implementing red-flag laws.

“The Vice President is calling on states to pass red flag laws and to use Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (BSCA) funding to help implement laws already enacted,” the release states.

Takeaways

Harris has become the country’s highest ranking anti-gun activist. She is not opposed to lying, spinning or gaslighting the public as long as it’s strategic and meets her needs. Neither will she hesitate in demonizing those who oppose her gun control schemes, such as labeling them feckless or extremists.

Quite frankly, Kamala Harris comes across as goofy, but she has surrounded herself with a team of dedicated individuals who are anything but. They are as committed to infringing upon our Second Amendment rights as we are to preserving them.

We underestimate Harris and her team of experienced anti-gun advocates at our peril.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

132 COMMENTS

  1. I pray that she doesn’t get any further up the ladder.

    I’d imagine she’ll be treated the same way as ol Joe, rigged interviews, little access to any “outside” press, treated with kid gloves by the press, no going without the teleprompter etc etc. Lest she expose who she really is.

    Dangerous times indeed.

    • And any tough questions brushed away with “that’s sexist” and “that’s racist.”
      “You’re racist and sexist for asking that.”

      A sacred cow installed into the office despite being widely disliked and not earning a single vote when she tried to do it the right way. Peak DEI.

    • “Whatever still didn’t earn it”

      Really?

      She graduated law school and worked as an assistant district attorney in California for several years. In 2003, she was elected DA of San Francisco. She was elected attorney general of California in 2010 and re-elected in 2014. Harris served as the junior U.S. senator from California from 2017 to 2021.
      And she has served as vice president of the United States for the past four years.

      Interesting contrast to her opponent, when Donald Trump was elected in 2016 he had never received a single vote in any election. He had never served in public office and has won exactly one single election in 2016.

      Vice President Harris has actually been elected to a statewide office in the largest state in the union four times, as well as being elected to the office of Vice President in a nationwide election in 2020.

      This should be a very interesting contest, experienced prosecutor versus convicted felon.

      • She “earned” her start in politics on her knees, ask Willie Brown. She was Montell Williams “side piece” for a while. So maybe she found a way to influence her professors? She obviously has some talents, just not any that qualify her for cleaning up the mess she and Biden have left this country in!

        • “She “earned” her start in politics on her knees, ask Willie Brown“

          So you have a problem with her having a relationship with a male partner?

          And I thought the citizens of California are the ones who elected her to public office four different times.

          • “And I thought the citizens of California…”

            And I thought the leftist residents of California…

            FIFY

          • He was married and a public official. She road his “coat tails” to public office, i.e., through nepotism.

            • “He was married“

              Legally separated from his wife for 10 years:

              “Brown was separated from his wife during the relationship, which was not a secret.
              Brown, 90, is a former mayor of San Francisco who was serving as speaker of the California State Assembly in the 1990s when he and Harris were in a relationship. Brown had separated from his wife in 1982”

              https://time.com/7001670/kamala-harris-fact-check-false-claims-citizenship-black-willie-brown-montel-williams/

              “and a public official“

              So you think public officials are not allowed to enter into romantic relationships, strange.

              “She road his “coat tails” to public office, i.e., through nepotism“

              You obviously don’t know what the word ‘nepotism’ means.

          • MajorLiar,

            “So you have a problem with her having a relationship with a male partner?”

            NO, you absolute turnip!! We have a problem with (i) her having an adulterous affair with a married politician, and (ii) her being ELEVATED to her job because she was the side piece of Willie Brown (at the time, the most powerful Dim politician in KKKalifornia, and (iii) “She was elected attorney general of California in 2010 and re-elected in 2014. Harris served as the junior U.S. senator from California from 2017 to 2021.”. We know math is not your strong suit (serious question: Do you even HAVE a “strong suit”, and if so, why are you hiding your light under a bushel?), but . . . that’s THREE statewide elections, dipsh*t, not four (San Francisco DA is a city/county office), and (iv) she GRADUATED LAW SCHOOL???? Big f*ckin’ deal., and (v) the SF DA, AND the CA AG? Not courtroom lawyers – they are administrators (but, then, knowing NOTHING about law, you would be unaware of that).

            She is a dumb@$$, inarticulate, incompetent, and that annoying cackle would peel paint. She was a Senator for three years – NAME her legislative accomplishments. She was SF DA and CA AG – so tell us about her record as a “prosecutor”, MajorLiar.

            MajorMistake, she’s not going to date you. Kamal-toe Harris is the ULTIMATE DEI hire, and now she has NO record to run on. Border Czar? Yeah, how’d that work out??? “Gun Violence Prevention” Czar??? Yeah, that was a frickin’ home run, too!! She’s a legitimate shill for unlimited abortion . . . and that is the alpha and omega of Kamal-toe’s “accomplishments”.

            Your pathetic attempts to carry water for incompetent Dimocrats (sorry for the redundancy) says more about you than your idiotic “comments” – you are a less-than-midwit, dishonest propagandist, with delusions of adequacy.

            • I’m no fan of Harris, but let’s be fair. 1. You don’t turn down a favor from Willie Brown. 2. Those 2 commission posts probably didn’t even crack the top 20 best jobs Willie doled out that year. She did not show good judgement in dating him in the first place, but not my business. Her performance in the offices she has been legit elected to has not been stellar for sure.

              • “Her performance in the offices she has been legit elected to… “

                “In the early 2000s, the San Francisco murder rate per capita outpaced the national average. Within the first six months of taking office, Harris cleared 27 of 74 backlogged homicide cases by settling 14 by plea bargain and taking 11 to trial; of those trials, nine ended with convictions and two with hung juries. She took 49 violent crime cases to trial and secured 36 convictions.[85] From 2004 to 2006, Harris achieved an 87-percent conviction rate for homicides and a 90-percent conviction rate for all felony gun violations.[86]
                Harris also pushed for higher bail for criminal defendants involved in gun-related crimes“

            • “We have a problem with (i) her having an adulterous affair“

              But you are still going to vote for triple adulterer Donald Trump.

              Why the different standard for the white man? Oh wait, I guess I answered my own question…

              Hypocrisy and racism.

              • MajorLiar,

                Boy, you really ARE a complete turnip, aren’t you?????

                Please note, you quarter-wit:
                1. I already said, NUMEROUS times, that I don’t approve of Trump’s morality, either. Remember the part where I said, repeatedly, “we are voting for a president, not a pope”?? Or are you so stupid and bereft of reading comprehension that you failed to understand that part?

                2. In Kamala’s case, it is less about the FACT of her adulterous relationship, than the fact that that (side piece to Willie Brown) not only was the basis for her entry into politics, it was her SOLE qualification for politics (Willie Brown was, at the time, the most powerful Dimocrat politician in KKKalifornia. I ALSO disapprove of John Kerry using his gigolo money to get HIS start in politics, you toad. Now, tell me exactly how Donald’s adultery started or enhance his political career.

                3. I notice you’ve carefully avoided even attempting to cite Kamal-toe’s “accomplishments” in the Senate. Wise, that, since she hasn’t any. As for her ‘record’ in law enforcement, do a little research on how those numbers compare to KKKalifornia in general during the same period, and other cities of comparable size/demographics during that period. Oh, and explain how an ADMINISTRATOR (which is all Kamal-toe was, in both jobs) is “responsible” for that.

                4. I notice you carefully elided over you pathetic arithmetic blunder in claiming four statewide elections. I mean even YOU ought to be able to count on your fingers.

                5. Citing “graduating from law school” as a qualification for political office says it all, dunnit, MajorMistake. Trust me, it isn’t. Nor is your GED.

                And the pathetic attempt to play the race card should be beneath even a pimple on the butt of humanity like you. But, these days, that’s ALL you Leftist/fascists have, innit???

                Go micturate up a cable, MajorMistake.

          • Yes she had an adulterous affair with the married Willie Brown. Who got his unqualified mistress, high paying jobs in Democrat controlled California.

            And yes I know Libertarians Liberals and the Left don’t care about adultery.

            Because they have never believed in loyalty. They don’t know what the concept of loyalty means.

            • “Yes she had an adulterous affair“

              Donald Trump had three, including actual fornication with a porn star while his third wife was at home with the new baby.

              “Because they have never believed in loyalty. They don’t know what the concept of loyalty means“

              So you’re saying Donald Trump has never believed in loyalty. He doesn’t know what the concept of loyalty means, right?

              Or is it somehow OK that Trump was fucking a porn star for money, but if Kamala Harris is in a relationship with a legally separated man it’s a big deal.

              Hypocrisy, they name is conservative Republican

              • You still don’t believe in loyalty. Also getting a job because you had sex with someone is called prostitution.

                Now I would hope for some honesty. And have her supporters say Harris is the first prostitute to be
                elected VP.

                That would help to get the ho.mos.exua.l vote. Since gays don’t believe in loyalty.

                To the sexually liberated adultery is just another sex act.

              • MajorLiar,

                You never learned the “First Rule of Holes”, did you??

                In the first instance, both Trump AND Stormy Daniels have stated publicly that no “fornication” occurred (of course Stormy, being the opportunist liar that she is, has told about 10 different versions of the story, depending on what she felt was in her best interests, at the time. For the fourth or fifth time, we are voting for a president, not a pope. What adultery should NOT be, ever, is your sole qualification for public office, as it was in Kamal-toe’s case.

                You really are too stupid to insult.

        • “She was Montell Williams “side piece” for a while“

          So you have an objection to two single people dating? That’s kind of creepy.
          Just what could it be that you object to? Let’s see, it’s a man and woman so it can’t be the LGBT issue…

          But they are both black, do you believe there are different rules for Black people versus white people?

          “@KamalaHarris and I briefly dated about 20 years ago when we were both single,” he wrote in an X post at the time. “So what? I have great respect for Sen. Harris. I have to wonder if the same stories about her dating history would have been written if she were a male candidate?”

          https://time.com/7001670/kamala-harris-fact-check-false-claims-citizenship-black-willie-brown-montel-williams/

      • going to school and working in a position does not mean you earned it.

        Here comes Miner49er to push the latest left-wing agenda and false or disingenuous left-wing propaganda.

        • “Did I stutter?“

          You know, Joe Biden can help you with that…

          “In moving speech, boy says Biden helped him overcome stutter
          BY WILL WEISSERT
          Published 11:59 AM EDT, August 21, 2020
          After that event, Biden invited Brayden backstage to talk more about learning to control a stutter. Biden noted that he’d practiced by speaking as he looked at himself in the mirror. He also gave the boy a speech he’d prepared for delivery, complete with markings he’d made on its pages that showed where he had time to take breaks and pauses so that the words would come out more smoothly.

          Brayden held up that speech for convention viewers on Thursday.

          ADVERTISEMENT

          “I’m just trying to be a kid,” Brayden said. “And in a short amount of time, Joe Biden made me feel more confident about something that’s bothered me my whole life. Joe Biden cared. Imagine what he could do for all of us.”

          https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-ap-top-news-politics-lifestyle-nh-state-wire-30951d24b0dab8b9ced01704d8ee9f2c

      • minor49iq…Leave it to you to try to put lipstick on a pig carrying around Gun Control which your useful idiot behind knows is a racist and nazi based insane agenda. If that doesn’t spell scumbags on both your parts I do not know what does.

        TRUMP/VANCE 2024

      • “…when Donald Trump was elected in 2016 he had never received a single vote in any election.”

        He received enough votes to take out the biggest names in Republican politics during the primaries. People are tired of lifelong politicians and bureaucrats. Surviving and thriving in the private sector is very different compared to a life of sucking the government teat.

        • “Surviving and thriving in the private sector“

          Having a daddy who made hundreds of millions of dollars from government contracts doesn’t qualify you for public office.

          Especially when you consider those millions were made through shell corporations, fraud and tax dodges:

          “NEW YORK (AP) — The New York Times reported Tuesday that President Donald Trump received at least $413 million from his father over the decades, much of that through dubious tax dodges, including outright fraud.

          The 15,000-word Times report contradicts Trump’s portrayal of himself as a self-made billionaire who started with just a $1 million loan from his father.

          The Times says Trump and his father, Fred, avoided gift and inheritance taxes by setting up a sham corporation and undervaluing assets to tax authorities. The Times says its report is based on more than 100,000 pages of financial documents, including confidential tax returns from the father and his companies.“

          https://apnews.com/article/0452d29cd2564eaf97605ab90acc3a67

          Trump’s business fraud actually qualified him for conviction on 34 felony counts, that’s quite the ‘record’ to run on.

          • Seeing if any of the mud will stick? Still? Lol what are you going to do if the “felonies” get overturned. God damn dude best you have is an 8 year old fake news era hit piece.

            • “Seeing if any of the mud will stick?“

              That question has been answered:

              “Trump Fraud Trial Penalty Will Exceed $450 Million
              The ruling in Donald J. Trump’s civil fraud case could cost him all his available cash. The judge said that the former president’s “complete lack of contrition” bordered on pathological.

              The civil trial tested Donald J. Trump’s claims of wealth and a judge found them fraudulent. The former president is expected to appeal.
              By Jonah E. Bromwich and Ben Protess
              Feb. 16, 2024”

              “8 year old fake news era hit piece“

              Hilarious.

              • MajorLiar,

                Care to make a wager about how that judgement is going to survive appeal, you total doorknob???

              • Miner isn’t the type of man that keeps his word. It took him years to admit that he lost our Biden open the border bet. “The border is secure.” “This is the most secure election in the history of the world. That’s why we vote against election integrity laws.”

              • “It took him years to admit that he lost our Biden open the border bet. “The border is secure.”

                Glad I came back to take a look at this, your childish attempt to rewrite history is laughable.

                I never said the border was secure at any point.

                Your claim was that “Biden opened the border” and I have refuted that claim with facts.

                “Practically since his first week in office, President Joe Biden has faced repeated criticisms from Republicans and some Democrats that his border policy amounts to “open borders.” This criticism is not simply inaccurate: it is unhinged from reality in a way that distinguishes itself from normal political hyperbole. Indeed, U.S. immigration policy is effectively closed borders, and Biden’s immigration policies and goals are largely the same as those of President Donald Trump“

                https://www.cato.org/blog/bidens-border-policy-not-open-borders

              • Hey, MajorLiar!

                Glad I came back, too (if nothing else, just to rebut your REPEATED lies). Please tell us, oh great scholar of immigration policy, exactly HOW the US policy is being ‘implemented’ by Biden, given that:

                1. The OFFICIAL POLICY (as articulated in ACTUAL LEGISLATION) is that illegal border crossers, when encountered, are to be EJECTED, not released into the country and given ‘court dates’ (that they rarely if ever actually appear for) years or even decades in the future?

                2. Why is Senile Joe proposing to give them work permits (totally illegal work permits, by the way)?

                3. Why has Joe allowed minors (both unaccompanied and those whose alleged ‘parents’ ARE detained (the few who are) to be released without follow-up or supervision? HOW many unaccompanied minors has the incompetent Biden administration “misplaced”??

                4. WHO, exactly, ended the “Remain in Mexico” policy???

                5. WHAT, precisely, does US law specify for those ‘seeking asylum’, and how has the Biden clown show implemented that legislation?? Even a cursory examination of the LEGAL basis to seek asylum clearly shows that the Biden clown show isn’t even pretending to follow it.

                Take your lies, fold ’em until they are all corners, and forcibly stuff ’em where the sun don’t shine, you lying sh*tweasel.

                Oh, and WHO, on national TV in a Presidential debate with Trump, expressly TOLD illegal immigrants to ‘surge the border’??? Pretty sure that was Senile Joe . . . and you KNOW THAT, you lying political slut.

          • “Having a daddy who made…”

            That’s certainly more than most people begin with. Here’s why it doesn’t matter. Trump lost everything. Then he made a comeback to become a billionaire again. He had to overcome adversity, and he came out of it better than ever. If he was still a Democrat, he would be celebrated as an amazing success story.

            Celebrities are multimillionaires, and yet they somehow end up broke. People inherit lots of money, and it’s gone within a generation or two. Trump survived and thrived in the toughest real estate market in the world.

            Contrast that with Kamala getting her start. I see a big difference. The felony narrative doesn’t matter once you check the context. As usual, Democrats are counting on their followers either being ignorant, or immoral enough to cheer on political persecution.

          • The problem with Miner49er’s link for its hit-piece portrayal with a lot of false, is this > “The Times says”.

            Miner49 doesn’t care if its true or not, he just has to push that left wing narrative. Miner49er doesn’t have ‘opinions’ he writes to comment, he has violent left-wing agenda that tells him what his ‘opinion’ is and that’s what he comments.

            • “Miner49 doesn’t care if its true or not“

              Absolutely false, and that’s why I post citations for every assertion I make.

              If you think the Times is factually in error on any of the points I posted above, why don’t you answer briefly and clearly with adversarial evidence or testimony to prove your point?

              You don’t, because you have nothing.

              And your ad hominem attacks on my character are a dead giveaway.

              Has the Times been wrong before?

              You bet, and they print retractions and corrections when proven wrong.

              Unlike Fox News who paid almost a billion dollars for intentionally lying to you about the 2020 election:

              “WILMINGTON, Del. (AP) — Fox News agreed Tuesday to pay Dominion Voting Systems nearly $800 million to avert a trial in the voting machine company’s lawsuit that would have exposed how the network promoted lies about the 2020 presidential election.“

              So answer just this one question, do you think that is fake news?

              • MajorLiar,

                And the fact that you consider a NYT hit piece. And your completely insane claim that the NYT always publishes a retraction when they are proven disastrously wrong is so absurd is doesn’t warrant a response, but I will ask you (i) where is the NYT’s retraction of Walter Duranty’s LIES about Stalin (for which they received a Pulitzer Prize that they’s ALSO never returned), and (ii) their retraction of the Russian collusion lies (interesting, apparently the NYT thinks Russian collusion is OK, so long as THEY are the ones doing it).

                Careful, MajorLiar, or you’ll throw your back out trying to carry all that water for your fellow lying Leftist/fascists.

          • MajorLiar,

            So, what’s your line going to be when those 34 “felony convictions” (for an alleged 34 instances of arguably questionable bookkeeping – a MISDEMEANOR, in case you’re interested. Oh, and the statute of limitations had already EXPIRED for that) are overturned???

            I’m not a major Trump fan (didn’t vote for him in ’16, didn’t vote for him in ’20), but ANY rational person (which obviously leaves YOU out) can take one objective look at Kamal-toe’s “record” in politics and recognize that she’s an incompetent DEI hire – after being the first “major” Dim to DROP OUT of the Dim primaries (didn’t win a SINGLE delegate), she gets selected as the VP pick because??? She’s a “woman of color” (Senile Joe expressly SAID that, before he picked her, and in announcing his pick). Being a LIGHT ‘cafe-au-lait’ INDIAN, and having a vagina, are NOT ‘qualifications’, you doorknob!

        • “ People are tired of lifelong politicians and bureaucrats. Surviving and thriving in the private sector is very different compared to a life of sucking the government teat.”

          Preach it Dude!

        • “He received enough votes to take out the biggest names in Republican politics during the primaries“

          So you are counting primaries? OK, Donald Trump has won a total of two primaries.

          Kamala Harris has won 5 primaries, twice statewide for AG, once statewide for the United States Senate and twice on the presidential ticket as Biden’s VP.

          Kamala Harris has already secured pledges from more than enough delegates to win the nomination at the Democratic convention, clearing her way to be the next president of the United States of America.

          “Because Biden dropped out before the formal mechanisms that would have made him the Democratic nominee, there is nothing yet for his opponents to challenge in court and they’ll face an uphill battle once they do.

          “The Democratic Party did not have an official nominee yesterday, and the same can be said today,” said David Becker, a former DOJ attorney and election law expert who advises state election officials of both parties. “Until the delegates vote, Democratic Party rules state that there is no official Democratic nominee. There was no one to be ‘replaced’ on the ballot because there is nothing to replace yet.”

          “As a legal matter, it is up to the convention to nominate a candidate. And all the legal precedent is on courts deferring to the party’s choice for its nominee and then giving the voters the choice,” said Ben Ginsberg, a Republican campaign attorney who has served as general counsel for several previous GOP nominees“

          • Yeah, MajorLiar, winning a few statewide primaries, in a cobalt blue state like KKKalifornia is TOTES the same as winning MANY state primaries in a national election. Your blatant LIE that ” . . . So you are counting primaries? OK, Donald Trump has won a total of two primaries.” is pathetic, even for you:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2024_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries

            You see, EACH STATE has primaries in each presidential election, you doorknob – and Trump won a HUGE majority of those, in both cases. You should try to limit yourself to lies that aren’t so blatant – not that it would do your non-existent credibility any good; like the MSM you intentionally gave that away, LONG ago. Since you have completely proved that you are a total doorknob, why don’t you head out and install yourself on an outhouse door? It would be the pinnacle of your career (and totally appropriate, for you).

      • While Trump never held any public office before becoming POTUS, he achieved a lot while in the White House; conversely, Harris was has been in public service her entire carreer (much like her current boss) and yet has not done anything beneficial for the public. It can be agued that her actions were aven detrimental to the public.

      • I Thought Convicted Felons went to Jail.? Last I checked, he was playing golf and campaigning. Meanwhile, Joe got shoveled off like shit on a sidewalk in Portland. A failed assassination attempt and then POOF your monkey is no longer needed. I bet if it were successful, he’d still be in office. But you see nothing, do you, Shultz?

        • “I Thought Convicted Felons went to Jail.?“

          Perhaps in Russia that is the case, but I’m happy to inform you here in the United States a defendant is often permitted to remain free on bail while their appeal is pending.

          “I bet if it were successful, he’d still be in office“

          Well you know, Joe Biden is still in office as the President of the United States of America, I’m not sure how you missed that.

          Hope this helps!

          • MajorLiar,

            Joe Biden hasn’t been ANYTHING but a puppet for at least the last two years – he is mentally incapable (of course, he was mentally incapable of being President the day he was elected to the Senate). WORST President in my lifetime (if not all of US history), and I’ve lived through LBJ, the Peanut Farmer, Billy Zipperpants, Barry Soetoro, both Bushes, and Richard Nixon, so I have some knowledge of REALLY unqualified and inept presidents. Again, you are a doorknob.

      • Being a politician is not an indication of her competence. And here you go again, changing and misdirecting the conversation. The issue is: is she a gun banner extremist? Being in California, I can assure you that she will do anything, including committing perjury, to limit or eliminate any and all guns. By lying under oath, she was solely responsible for a 2/3 reduction in the number of handguns authorized for sale in California. She backed several bills that first reduced, and then eliminated certain “privileges” afforded to concealed weapons permittees to carry on school campuses, despite the absence of a single incident of misconduct. (In fact, the only negligent discharge was by a LEO.)
        As an aside, I’ve been an attorney for over 3 years, and as a litigator, I do a lot of public speaking in court. So why can’t she, as a former prosecutor, seem to have such an issue speaking in comprehensible sentences without a teleprompter? (P.S. I have to admit that as a DA and as AG she didn’t try any cases. Further, both SF and California in general are highly partisan. Democrats are a shoe-in for public offices.)

      • She was not elected vice president. No one votes for vice president, only for president. You know full well that she got absolutely no traction (and no money) when she ran for president in the primaries.

          • No, you quarter-wit, he is observing the WELL-KNOWN FACT that . . . no one votes for a “ticket” based on the VP. For obvious reasons (well, obvious to anyone other than a lying Leftist/fascist propagandist doorknob) – as John Nance Garner famously said, “The vice presidency isn’t worth a pitcher of warm spit!” I’m sure there are some equally dimwitted Dimocrat voters out there who voted for the ticket because the “historic” woman of color was on it (you guys are stupid, that way). ANYONE who voted for the “ticket” because that unqualified, inarticulate, babbling moron was on the ticket was going to vote Dim no matter WHO the VP pick was. Tell us, MajorLiar, since you fancy yourself such a student of history, politics, and the Constitution (a laughable delusion, if ever there was one) – what EXACTLY are the VPs duties under the Constitution? Do you even KNOW??

            Don’t compound your lies with foolish illogic.

            • “no one votes for a “ticket” based on the VP“

              Really? Too bad you can’t talk to John McCain regarding how many votes having Sarah Palin as VP candidate cost him.

              “The vice presidency isn’t worth a pitcher of warm spit!”

              Oh, I don’t know about that, looks like VP Kamala Harris is doing OK.

              • MajorLiar,

                Yeah, let’s circle back on Nov. 6 . . . if the Dims even stick with Kamal-toe. And any idiot knows that Sarah Palin was a net positive to creepy RINO McCain’s campaign, DESPITE the dishonest lies and hit jobs you “honest” Leftist/fascists pulled on her. The fact that the Leftist/fascists didn’t like Sarah doesn’t mean conservatives didn’t. Conservatives and libertarians don’t take voting advice from lying Leftist idiots.

                I repeat – NO ONE votes for a ticket because of the VP choice. For the obvious reason that that person is NOT going to occupy the Oval Office, and ANY influence the may have on the Administration is strictly informal/unofficial and inside the White House and PERHAPS their own party. Nice try though, doorknob.

    • Here’s some important information from a member of the TTAG community:

      “Tombstone Gabby
      July 27, 2024 At 00:43

      Vattel, “The Law of Nations” from the 1750’s . The laws that were in effect at that time in various countries. At least one copy of that book is known to have been present when the US Constitution was drawn up.

      Book 1, Para 212 shows: “The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”
      (Obama slid by even though only one of his parents was a US citizen.)

      Book 1, Para 214 defines “naturalized citizens”. A nation, or the sovereign who represents it, may grant to a foreigner the quality of citizen, by admitting him into the body of the political society. This is called naturalisation. ….. Finally, there are states, as, for instance, England, where the single circumstance of being born in the country naturalises the children of a foreigner.
      The new United States followed English Law.

      So, born on US soil, a “naturalized” citizen, not a “natural born” citizen.

      US Constitution, Article 2, Section 1: “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President.”
      The US Constitution does not define “natural born”, as it’s meaning was common knowledge at that time in history.

      Neither of Ms Harris’s parents were US citizens at the time of her birth in 1964.”

  2. Lately been seeing the whole using DEI to describe Harris is the same as the n word on the various talking points. Whatever still didn’t earn it.

    • Joe Biden must have called her the n word then. He’s the one that told us he would nominate a black woman as VP. According to the Democrat president, she’s a DEI hire. However, it will NOT help us to keep pointing that out, at this point. Let’s stick to the easy issues that affect everyone like inflation and open borders, and the fact that Kamala has lied to the American public for 3.5 years about Biden’s health.

  3. 2020 Primaries “She/Her” contemplated banning ‘red meat’ to fight ‘global warming’ (all the while grilling steaks in a photo op [looking at you Chuck S.]). Talk radio discussions on “She/Her” voting record leans farther left than Bolshevik Bernie. “She/Her” has earned the moniker “Lyin Kamala”.

    • Vinny says:

      “2020 Primaries “She/Her” contemplated banning ‘red meat’“

      Nope, you’re making a false claim which is very interesting considering you’re accusing Kamala Harris of lying.

      “Harris said the government should offer incentives and dietary guidelines to reduce the consumption of meat, but she didn’t say she wants to eliminate beef altogether”

      https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/aug/14/facebook-posts/no-kamala-harris-didnt-say-she-wants-eliminate-bee/

      Personally, I want conservatives eating all the red meat they possibly can… Preferably slathered in butter with a side of fried potatoes, all washed down with beer.

      • Apparently context research isn’t a thing with the left wing Politifact nor you Miner49.

        “Harris said the government should offer incentives and dietary guidelines to reduce the consumption of meat, but she didn’t say she wants to eliminate beef altogether”

        The clue is in the words “reduce the consumption of meat”. Her idea is that government would offer “incentives and dietary guidelines”. But those “incentives and dietary guidelines” she alludes to will be used to eliminate the beef industry thus eventually “eliminate beef altogether” by making beef the less purchased/used ‘meat’ source thus an industry not able to sustain its production of beef because hardly anyone would buy it under the “Harris” concept.

        So while its true she did not come right out and say “contemplated banning ‘red meat’ “, its a false impression because she actually does want to eventually, in effect, ‘ban’ red meats ‘marketing’ by destroying the industry through more of her back door methodology.

        • “So while its true she did not come right out and say “contemplated banning ‘red meat’ “

          Thank you for admitting you were wrong.

      • RE: minor49iq…”Personally, I want conservatives eating all the red meat they possibly can… Preferably slathered in butter with a side of fried potatoes, all washed down with beer.”

        Personally I can see You just want conservatives dead from a distance like the coward on the roof. Keep talking azzhole, your’re on a roll.

        TRUMP/VANCE 2024.

      • “…Preferably slathered in butter with a side of fried potatoes, all washed down with beer.”

        …With the implication being that you want people who disagree with you about politics to die?

      • “Personally, I want conservatives eating all the red meat they possibly can… Preferably slathered in butter with a side of fried potatoes, all washed down with beer“

        Thank you. Although i’d rather have asparagus and grilled onions as sides and wash it dowm with some dark ale. I’ll then follow that up with some cannolis along with some strong espresso, then a little later on whisky with a Montecristo or a Cohiba

        We’ll still outlive vegans and vegetarians……

        • Ultimately avoiding heavily processed food, seed oils and excessive sugar will be more important than where the essential fats proteins and carbs consist of.

            • …” and again, where’s there a good semi when you need one? ”
              Remember calling me out on that insinuation Miner? But that’s right, you claimed to be Mr. High Road that would never wish ill upon anyone !!
              Your true hypocrisy is a shining beacon for all – Hail Miner !

              • “Remember calling me out on that insinuation Miner?“

                Yes, you were wishing for a truck to directly kill your political opponents.

                I on the other hand, merely agreed that flesh eaters should eat all the flesh they wished.

                Of course, I realize the difference in those two positions is incomprehensible to you.

      • Better question, MajorDoorknob – where in the Constitution is the federal government granted the authority to have ANY power, whether mandatory or ‘persuasive’, over personal decisions (like, oh, choice of food to eat)??? The federal government needs to get the hell out of the social engineering business – it is neither authorized nor competent to get involved.

        As for your wish for Republicans to die, (a) definitely on-brand for you violent, immoral Leftist/fascists, and (b) it is based on a pathetically ignorant and inaccurate ‘knowledge’ of health and nutrition. But, again, on brand for a doorknob of a Leftist/fascist troll and lying propagandist. Fly your freak flag HIGH, MajorDoorknob!!

        • “the authority to have ANY power, whether mandatory or ‘persuasive’, over personal decisions (like, oh, choice of food to eat)???“

          So you don’t think the federal government has the authority to identify and restrict the production and consumption of dangerous substances?

          Great, can I interest you in some of my patent snake oil medicine, cures all ills, from the lameness in the horses to the children’s colds and chills!

          And really, why shouldn’t teenagers have access to heroin and methamphetamine, freedom!

          • MajorIdiot,

            Please be specific – from what EXPRESS PROVISION of the Constitution does such power allegedly arise. Citation, please.

            While I agree that minors should NOT be allowed free access to drugs or alcohol . . . isn’t that the PARENTS’ job??? I know you are the kind of idiot who believes that big daddy government should do all the things that your are too incompetent/lazy to do, that’s not actually how the world works. Since you do not appear to have the degree of wisdom and self-awareness that should flow from being an actual parent, I’m going to guess that you are childless (and thank God, Allah, Buddha, and Zoroaster for THAT disaster being averted!!), so I’ll take your blathering stupidity for what it is worth – exactly nothing.

            NO, the federal government has NO power, right, ability, and CERTAINLY no competence, to deny free US citizens a damn thing, you doorknob.

        • “As for your wish for Republicans to die“

          Nope, never said or insinuated any such idea.

          I merely suggested that flesh eaters should eat all the flesh they wanted.

          Do you think Republicans should be restricted from eating all the flesh they want, that’s a strange position coming from you.

  4. (Harris said) “I’m in favor of the Second Amendment …”

    Well, that’s a lie right there (among the other whoppers she told that are outlined in the article). While she was the AG of California her SOP was to intentionally violate constitutional rights, any of them, for any person when ever she chose to do so. Plus she has continued that constitutional right violating SOP now as VP in her ‘office of gun-violence prevention’ thing by using backdoor methods through her 100% biased anti-gun staff to support and facilitate any violation of any constitutional right if there is anything resembling a gun involved and its already gotten innocent people killed.

    This woman has literally, by proxy, murdered innocent people.

    There is no “Amendment” she is “in favor of”.

  5. I do not “underestimate” her. She’s almost literally a cackling satan. Nearly all she has “accomplished” has been evil. Perhaps the worst vice presidont ever. To the incarceration of lot’s of black men to being pro-baby murder that’s about it. If somehow she “wins” I predict mass(as in millions)of folk’s literally giving it the one finger salute.

    • We know she’s horrible, but generally speaking, it’s a terrible idea to elect a leader that never had children. As parents know, having children changes your outlook.

      • “generally speaking, it’s a terrible idea to elect a leader that never had children“

        That’s an interesting assertion, I assume you’re relying on some research to support your claim?

        Good thing Kamala Harris was stepmother for two kids for the past 10 years.

        • Yes. It’s my understanding that she never had a child that was born. She waited late in life to get married. Her focus wasn’t on family. It was on herself. That’s a self-centered life.

          A stepmother isn’t remotely close to being either a biological mother, or being the sole mother to a child from birth/near birth. You’re either laughably ignorant or disingenuous.

          • “She waited late in life to get married. Her focus wasn’t on family. It was on herself. That’s a self-centered life“

            So to you, every woman who chooses not to have children is living a self-centered life. Amazing.

            A stepmother isn’t remotely close… “

            So to you, no stepmother is actually a mother to the children in her care.

            Wow.

            • Wow? Is this your dumb act, or is it real?

              I seriously doubt Kamala’s husband had full custody of the children. Even if he did, his son was beginning college when they got married. Do you think occasionally seeing her new husband’s son activated her nurturing and loving motherly feelings? His daughter was fifteen. Do you think a fifteen-year-old looks at their father’s new wife even remotely the same as their own mother? Do you think if Kamala actually directed that child like a parent would that it would have remotely the same impact as if it came from her actual mother? Soon thereafter, she ran for the US senate, so it isn’t like she was around them that much before they were adults.

              Are you really that stupid, or is this your play dumb routine? Did you ever, in your wildest dreams, as a child, believe that you would grow up to play dumb around strangers on the internet to defend awful people that don’t care about your existence?

              Kamala got married when she was 49. At the age of 29, when most women are either raising their children, thinking about having children, or thinking about getting married, Kamala was dating a 60-year-old because she was thinking about ambition. Ambition for children, future children, or family? No, ambition for Kamala.

              There’s a saying that goes: God, family, country. Even atheists can understand it. It’s about your priorities. Where’s the self in that list? It’s about putting others before yourself, with virtue being the number one priority. As someone that never had children, and never had a chance to learn to nurture her stepchildren, Kamala doesn’t have the unique experience of nurturing and caring for a child. Kamala has always put Kamala at the top of her priority list. Vote accordingly.

              • “Do you think a fifteen-year-old looks at their father’s new wife even remotely the same as their own mother?“

                You must have amazing powers, now you are claiming to know how stepchildren view their fathers new wife. I have to tell you, I think your super power is a bit compromised:

                “Ella Emhoff wrote in an Instagram Story on Thursday morning, “How can you be ‘childless’ when you have cutie pie kids like Cole and I.”

                She included part of a statement that Kerstin Emhoff gave to CNN that read, in full: “These are baseless attacks. For over 10 years, since Cole and Ella were teenagers, Kamala has been a co-parent with Doug and I. She is loving, nurturing, fiercely protective, and always present. I love our blended family and am grateful to have her in it.”
                Ella Emhoff told Kerstin Emhoff to “say it louder for the people in the back,” adding, “I love my three parents.”

                “Ambition for children, future children, or family?“

                Maybe you are right… Just consider Donald Trump, he’s had children by at least three different women, how virtuous!

              • “You must have amazing powers, now you are claiming to know how stepchildren view their fathers new wife.”

                Common sense would inform any normal person. But, if you really want to get down to it, yes, I do know what it’s like. I’ve had a stepparent from a younger age than 15. We have a great, loving relationship. It isn’t remotely close to being a real parent-child relationship. At best, it’s like the cool uncle or aunt that takes an interest in you.

                Showing a comment from a politician’s family doesn’t disprove anything I said. You’d have to be a complete imbecile, in the historical sense of the term, to not agree with anything I’ve said regarding stepparent relations.

                The only way it would be close would be if the stepparent helped to raise the child from a very young age, and if that child didn’t have the other parent around. In other words, the mother dies or runs off when the child is very young, as in a baby or toddler, and the father remarries.

                It’s interesting that you brought Trump’s family into this. Compare and contrast Trump’s children with Biden’s children. Ashley and Hunter didn’t have nice things to say about Joe in their communications and diary. Then look how they turned out. They were both substance abusers despite a life of easy opportunity due to their father’s political career.

  6. “Vice President Harris has actually been elected to a statewide office in the largest state”

    LOL, you say that like it is a good thing, Comrade! It has been a long time since getting elected in Cacaphonia has been an indicator of being anything but an enemy of the “antiquated” Bill of Rights – and also right to self defense, Castle Doctrine, right engage in business without excessive regulation/taxation, etc,…

  7. “This should be a very interesting contest, experienced prosecutor versus convicted felon.”

    Yeah, Beria vs untold thousands…

    Or is it millions?

  8. She will steal this election.. Stop making Hollywood rich!!.. Stop watching fake news!..IF We keep watching the mockingbird media and the rich elites of Hollywood. Nothing will ever change…

  9. This website can help the cause by stop publishing that wolf-in-sheep’s-clothing leftist fraud.

    You all know who I’m talking about. She can try to publish her tripe in Politico or The Hill or Huffpo or the Jacobin or The Advocate or some other communist rag, but she shouldn’t publish here.

    Why? Because she votes for her identity group and environmental ideology over gun rights, and thinks she can make up for it by publishing pro gun material for sucker websites like this one.

    Howlett or Boch or whoever rungs TTAG, stop undermining your own mission and tell this commie to take a hike.

    • johnnyboy…your time would be better spent washing sheets for your next klan meeting…you bozo are not one to be criticizing anyone.

    • “tell this commie to take a hike“

      Yeah, does she think Americans believe in exercising your freedom of speech and allowing the free exchange of ideas?

      I mean really, nobody wants to hear anything that makes him feel uncomfortable, who wants to hear something that might threaten our treasured delusions.

      “Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost”
      Tommy J. 1786

          • Commies can’t hide behind unrelated topics to advance an agenda? Also good livestock that was almost clever.

            • Your continued obsession with ‘livestock’ is interesting, you mention them in almost every post.

              I imagine the farmers in your neighborhood would do well to keep an eye on you.

      • COOL STORY, BRO!!

        Now do the part about the Leftist/fascist campaign to deplatform conservatives, COVID skeptics, and (on THIS SITE on numerous occasions) “moderating” words like socialist, communist, etc.

        Again, if the Left couldn’t lie, they would be speechless.

  10. “Vice President Harris has actually been elected to a statewide office in the largest state”

    LOL, you say that like it is a good thing! It has been a long time since getting elected in Cacaphonia has been an indicator of being anything but an enemy of the “antiquated” Bill of Rights – and also right to self defense, Castle Doctrine, right to engage in business without excessive regulation/taxation, etc,…

  11. Higher taxes, higher crime, higher inflation, loss of individual liberty and freedom, Constant violations of the constitution, endless wars, the persecution of anyone who will not bow their knee to the false gods of climate change and the LGBTQ + death cult, further destruction of our national sovereignty through an open border policy that were result in more Americans being subjected to murdered, rape & pillage. This is some of what a Harris administration will bring you.

  12. In 1960, Democrats were circulating campaign posters that featured a photo of Richard Nixon that asked the question:
    “Would you buy a used car from this man?”

    In 2924, Republicans should be circulating a campaign poster that features a photo of Kamala Harris that asks the question:
    “Would you buy a blow job from this woman?”

    Of course when Republican polsters conducted a survey, they confirmed that far more people would answer affirmatively for Kamela Harris than for Hillary Clinton.

    • “Would you buy a blow job from this woman?”

      See, that’s how we know we’ve already won, all you’ve got is juvenile blowjob jokes.

      • MajorDoorknob,

        No, if you had the wit and reading ability to actually READ the comments made above, we go into EXTENSIVE detail about the reasons she is incompetent. What most of us are ALSO pointing out is that EVERYONE KNOWS she’s incompetent, and has from the beginning. She got into politics, and got her position as SF DA, SOLELY because she was Willie Brown’s side piece – and THAT’S what we’re objecting to. If she had actual qualifications, I personally wouldn’t care WHAT she did with her orifices. What I object to is being saddled with an unqualified, incompetent dimwit, who got where she is ONLY because she was putting out for Willie Brown (and, for your information, Willie Brown himself used to make jokes about her oral skills).

  13. Underestimate? Heck, I have never seen an ad campaign like this before. My Youtube ads are mostly Kackling Kammy begging for money.

    Also, I smile whenever I see minor49er comment in TTAG. His presence is confirmation that his argument is already lost. If he has to comment on TTAG to pretend he is convincing anyone, his side has already been defeated.

    • “Also, I smile whenever I see minor49er“

      Thanks for the compliment, I’m sorry to disappoint you but I don’t swing that way.

      Of course, I do appreciate bringing you joy, you’re welcome.

      • You don’t “swing that way”?? What, is it the fact that Ragnar looks nothing like your hand?? I’m sure your preferences are going to be a shock to dacian.

  15. We all know who Jennifer and her “wife” are voting for.

    DELETE AWAY, TTAG MOTHERFUCKERS.

  16. Did Harris ever renounce her Jamaican citizenship?

    The Jamaican Constitution provides that any child born to a Jamaican father anywhere in the world after August 5, 1962, is automatically a Jamaican citizen.

    3C. Every person born outside Jamaica shall become a citizen of Jamaica –
    on the sixth day of August, 1962, in the case of a person born before that date; or on the date of his birth, in the case of a person born on or after the sixth day of August, 1962, if, at that date, his father or mother is a citizen of Jamaica by birth, descent or registration by virtue of marriage to a citizen of Jamaica.

    https://pdba.georgetown.edu/Constitutions/Jamaica/jam62.html

    Do we want a “dual citizenship” President? (We know she’s not “natural born”, but Obama effectively cancelled that part of the US Constitution. To be “natural born”, both parents must be citizens at the time of birth.)

    • “To be “natural born”, both parents must be citizens at the time of birth”

      How interesting! Could you provide the actual constitutional reference for your claim?

      • Vattel, “The Law of Nations” from the 1750’s . The laws that were in effect at that time in various countries. At least one copy of that book is known to have been present when the US Constitution was drawn up.

        Book 1, Para 212 shows: “The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

        (Obama slid by even though only one of his parents was a US citizen.)

        Book 1, Para 214 defines “naturalized citizens”. A nation, or the sovereign who represents it, may grant to a foreigner the quality of citizen, by admitting him into the body of the political society. This is called naturalisation. ….. Finally, there are states, as, for instance, England, where the single circumstance of being born in the country naturalises the children of a foreigner.

        The new United States followed English Law.

        So, born on US soil, a “naturalized” citizen, not a “natural born” citizen.

        US Constitution, Article 2, Section 1: “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President.”

        The US Constitution does not define “natural born”, as it’s meaning was common knowledge at that time in history.

        Neither of Ms Harris’s parents were US citizens at the time of her birth in 1964.

        • Thank you for your detailed response!

          Sadly, a book written by a Prussian citizen who never set foot in the United States has no power over American citizens.

          “The new United States followed English Law”

          Not exactly, much of English Law we discarded. You’re not suggesting that the English Law of ‘the divine right of kings’ applies in the United States?

          But honestly, I’m thinking I like your proposition, and I may actually take a more active role in putting forth your conclusion.

          I mean, set aside the fact that several US presidents had parents who were not born in the United States.

          Your conclusion that Donald Trump is not eligible for the presidency is just so fascinating.

          When can we expect to see your personal call for Donald Trump to be removed from the ballot because (as you so eloquently outlined in your post) under the United States Constitution Donald Trump is ineligible for the Office of President of the United States?

          .

          .

          .

          I think Bill Shakespeare said it best;

          “Let it work,
          For ’tis the sport to have the enginer
          Hoist with his own petard; and ‘t shall go hard“

          • You might want to check this out as well:

            She has (had?) dual citizenship.

            The Jamaican Constitution provides that any child born to a Jamaican father anywhere in the world after August 5, 1962, is automatically a Jamaican citizen.

            https://pdba.georgetown.edu/Constitutions/Jamaica/jam62.html

            3C. Every person born outside Jamaica shall become a citizen of Jamaica – on the sixth day of August, 1962, in the case of a person born before that date; or on the date of his birth, in the case of a person born on or after the sixth day of August, 1962, if, at that date, his father or mother is a citizen of Jamaica by birth, descent or registration by virtue of marriage to a citizen of Jamaica.

            So the lady has dual citizenship, unless she renounced her Jamaican citizenship some time in the past. I’ve never heard of that happening.

  18. Calling her a clueless, incompetent, blithering idiot is a perfectly accurate estimation. What shouldn’t be underestimated is the mainstream media’s single-minded devotion to lying, spinning, and obfuscating to protect her from scrutiny and make her look as good as possible to the low-info majority, and the hundreds of [D] election officials who will be flooding every swing state with as many phony ballots as they can scribble out after the legit ones are all counted.

    • “mainstream media’s single-minded devotion to lying“

      Yes, even after Fox ‘News’ paid almost $1 billion for lying to you about the results of the 2020 election, many conservatives still continue to believe their propaganda broadcasts, fascinating!

      “During pre-trial discovery, Fox News’ internal communications were released, indicating that prominent hosts and top executives were aware the network was reporting false statements but continued doing so to retain viewers for financial reasons.“

      “Fox News agreed to pay Dominion $787.5 million and acknowledged the court’s earlier ruling that Fox had broadcast false statements about Dominion. The settlement did not require Fox News to apologize. It is the largest known media settlement for defamation in U.S. history“

      Well, there’s something to be proud of, largest known media settlement for lying in US history.

      • Fox isn’t mainstream like the others? Yes they lied about the 2020 election and covid like all the others.

      • Don’t act so smug, MajorDoorknob – there are LOTS of lawsuits pending by a number of prominent conservatives against the MSM, and the courts are moving many of them along, nicely (c.f., suits by Elon Musk and others).

        The rest of us can be honest about the fact that ALL “news media” lies (yes, Fox, too) – which is exactly WHY we don’t trust them. Capisce, butt nugget????

      • Another non-sequitur from a moron whose entire existence is a non-sequitur in itself. I said the media will cover for her and that’s manifestly obvious and indisputable because they’re already doing it. The only one talking about Fox News is you, because you have no chance of winning an argument unless you’re the only one making it.

        Get bent.

        • Hey Ferro-feline, you’re the one who brought up main stream media, which includes Fox ‘News’.

          I was just kind enough to provide a little context about the veracity of various members of the MSM, I’m sorry if the facts offend you.

  19. Harris is a DEI hire. Her job was to distract black and white liberals. And she was very successful at doing that.

    • She could very well choose the astronaut.

      Unlike VP candidate JP Mandel, Mark Kelly has served his country honorably:

      “In December 1987, Kelly became a naval aviator and received initial training on the A-6E Intruder attack aircraft. He was then assigned to Attack Squadron 115 (VA-115) in Atsugi, Japan, and made two deployments to the Persian Gulf on the aircraft carrier USS Midway, flying 39 combat missions in Operation Desert Storm. After receiving his master’s degree, Kelly attended the U.S. Naval Test Pilot School from 1993 to 1994. He has logged more than 5,000 hours in more than 50 different aircraft and has over 375 carrier landings“

      • And his wife is Gabby Giffords:

        Gabby Giffords attended the Helldorado Parade in Tombstone AZ about two weeks prior to her being elected to the House in 2008. A local couple – both Democrats – asked her how she felt about guns. “I always carry mine” as she displayed what appeared to be a 9mm semi-automatic pistol. They voted for her.

        Related to me by that couple after she had been shot. The couple were neighbors of mine.

      • Yes, Gabby Giffords was indeed a POTG.

        Right up untill she got shot in the head by a nut job who had possession of a firearm because of the lenient laws regarding acquisition of a firearm.
        Even a cursory interview before he purchased the firearm may have prevented the shooter gaining possession of a lethal weapon.

        “The neighbor who took Christina-Taylor to the event was haunted by the scene even as she slept, according to her husband.

        Coming out of sedation, Susan Hileman asked her husband, “How is Christina? What happened to Christina?” He had to tell her that the girl had died.

        As Hileman slept in the hospital that evening, her husband described “a cry of ‘Christina, Christina, let’s get out of here. Am I dying? Am I dying?’ ” In her sleep, Hileman spoke over and over of how she and Christina-Taylor squeezed each other’s hands when they were on the ground, face to face with their eyes locked on one another.”

        Nine year old Christina bled out before help arrived.

        Here’s an interesting story about the attack:

        “Friendly Firearms
        Gabrielle Giffords and the perils of guns: How an armed hero nearly shot the wrong man.
        BY WILLIAM SALETAN
        JAN 11, 20118:13 AM

        https://slate.com/technology/2011/01/joe-zamudio-and-the-gabrielle-giffords-shooting-how-an-armed-hero-nearly-shot-the-wrong-man.html

      • She could very well choose the astronaut.

        This will not be the reason, sure they will hype this but the real reason will be to show that his wife’s attempted killing far outweighs Trumps. And on your “because of the lenient laws regarding acquisition of a firearm” stuff I would point out all the states/city’s that have all the “laws” your side keeps telling us are the answer but I’d be wasting my time, after all Proverbs 18:2 & 23:9 applies here.

Comments are closed.