The 2024 General Election is now over and as the nation, states and local municipalities prepare for new representation, it appears “woke,” left-leaning lobbying groups have taken to attacking nonprofit organizations in an ill-focused attempt to gain new support.

A recent article posted by an antigun group launched an attack on a nonprofit organization dedicated to the health and well-being of children. Why? Because the charity hosted a fundraising event in which firearms were raffle prizes. They fail in their attempt to draw a nexus between charitable sportsmen’s fundraising and the criminal misuse of firearms, but they succeed in exposing the bias against lawful gun ownership.

As the article streamed details to portray a poor image of the demographic of attendees, it failed to highlight that the participants were law-abiding citizens, that tickets had to be purchased to participate and that a federal firearms license holder was on-site to ensure background checks were completed the same exact way they are completed at a firearms retailer.

Similar events, which are held for different nonprofit organizations across the nation, have raised millions of dollars to serve our communities. Whether it’s a local fire department, emergency services or nonprofit organizations, these groups do work to support our families, friends and neighbors.

Firearms raffles and auctions raise hundreds of thousands of dollars to support the efforts of charitable organizations both nationallay and locally.

This unwarranted attack raises questions, including why would you allow your political beliefs to attack people doing good for our communities? Does it feel good to sling attacks at an organization that offers medical care to children, totally free of charge should the family not have the means to pay? Would it be better to allow these children to live a life never knowing their full potential – free from the burdens of orthopedic challenges, severe burns or severe cleft lip or palate?

As long as it pushes your agenda, right?

While some may agree with their political position, it seems beyond reasonable to me that no one should ever attack charitable organizations that are trying to make a positive impact. These are organizations that are not politically postured in any way.  If you don’t like that fundraiser, don’t attend. My suggestion would be that instead of attempting to smear the good work they do, perhaps find another way to get involved in something you care about by volunteering or financially supporting a nonprofit organization.

The world has enough negativity right now. I sit and think about a 5-year-old little boy who has become a part of my life through my volunteering efforts. A child who had to have his leg amputated below the knee and even amid his challenges, his spirit and energy can light up a room. It’s through his determination, combined with the efforts of the charity, which I am proud to represent, that I’ve had the blessing of watching him run around like any other healthy child.

I simply wonder how someone can become so blinded by political hate that they would rather choose criticism and unnecessary attacks to raise funds against people who make such impressionable, life-changing opportunities come to fruition.

This isn’t about firearm safety, folks… it’s about choosing negativity and political weaponry over goodwill in our communities and it’s disappointing, to say the least.

I’ll proudly continue to volunteer and support people doing good work and I hope others will take this as a wake-up call to choose the high road, too.

—Art Thomm, Courtesy NSSF

Art Thomm is a proud member of the Divan of Beni Kedem Shriners and Director of Government Relations – State Affairs for NSSF  

19 COMMENTS

  1. When I was in highschool they raffled off a shotgun every year at the homecoming game. It was always a Browning A-5. Proceeds went to buy athletic equipment.

  2. If a person passes the magical background check, why not? I mean I was told that background checks would fix all that ails the world in terms of “gun violence.” After MBCs were the law of the land John Lennon’s “Imagine” would start playing followed by us all signing together in a circle. We’d probably each have a Coke in hand, although Pepsi is bidding for the rights at the moment.

    Maybe it’s just that someone desires to have such an object in the first place that causes their pearl clutching.

  3. Also, on a totally off topic remark. Does their logo make anyone else want to eat some sort of ultra processed food? I’m not sure which one even.

  4. Andrew Lias.
    Why yes yes it does.
    Reminds me of a bag of potato chips, or perhaps a restaurant with fine dining full of drunk farting gas bags.

  5. IMHO it isn’t so much that the “fail to see the difference” – they choose to ignore FACTS all while they push their ‘agenda(s)’ – and they will never stop.

  6. (New York crazy) – What the Daniel Penny Case Can Tell All of Us About Self Defense.

    h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cS0EgBUvI-c

    • No matter how weak a case if it is a normal person we will break them from lawfare before allowing justifiable self defense from becoming a known factor in any section of the state that has a blue, commie, or Soros aligned prosecutor. With that said the case is slowly falling apart so he should have a good chance of getting a positive verdict to go with the negative bank account.

  7. TYRANNY NIGHTMARE FUEL: Gun Controllers In Disarray As Nationwide Concealed Carry Is COMING.

    h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_e8OS6J56a8

  8. How Bruen Saved Our 2A Rights.

    Professor Mark Smith gave an important speech about the 2nd Amendment at the Federalist Society’s 2024 National Lawyers Convention.

    h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soq0Mwac-BU

  9. (even more problems with the Secret Service) Secret Service Investigating Trump-Hating Agent.

    h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHlUtyrlzus

Comments are closed.