[HTML1]
When I first reviewed the Smith & Wesson Model 640 Pro Series, I berated the trigger. Like most S&W revolver triggers, the go-pedal was as smooth as a baby’s backside. However, it was heavier than reading Heidegger. In the original German. In fact, the Model 640’s factory trigger pull maxed out a 12-pound gauge. So we hooked the trigger to the engine block of a Peterbilt to get a reading. Okay, I’m exaggerating. It was the rear end of a Fiat 500. Bottom line: the 640’s trigger pull assured inaccuracy at any reasonable distance . . .
Fortunately, a revolver is a simple machine: a collection of small pipes, bent pieces of metal and a couple of springs. If any one of the components don’t work as well as they should, fixing it isn’t a big deal. Especially if you’re competent gunsmith like Dave Santurri.
RF schlepped the 640 Pro Series to Dave for a quick trigger fix. A feathery, target-style trigger wasn’t the objective. We asked the Massachusetts man to deliver unto us a giggle switch with enough resistance for safe pocket or IWB carry and sufficient impact for perfectly reliable ignition yet light enough to shoot with precision. The goal was 50-50 blend of yin and yang, sacrificing as little as possible of either one for the benefit of the other.
A little time and $69 dollars later, Mssrs. Smith and Wesson were ready for their close-up. Dave had reduced the 640’s DAO pull by about a third to a bit over eight pounds (8.4). 1911 shooters may cringe at the thought of an eight-pound trigger; for a revolver, that’s fairly light.
With its trigger sorted, the 640 Pro is a completely different gun.
Pre-fix, shooting with the “power crease” was a requirement; it’s become an option. I can smoothly press the 640 Pro Series wheelgun’s trigger with the pad of my trigger finger without snapping my distal phalanx like a matchstick. Which leads to less pulling and pushing. Which leads to more accuracy and more comfort.
Shooting .38Spls, the all-steel Model 640 Pro Series is a pussycat, and, now, an accurate one to boot. [ED: Puss in Boots?] You could even say that the Model 640 Pro Series makes sense. With a controllable trigger, you can use the 640 Pro Series’ night sights to hit a target at greater than bad breath distance quickly, easily and reliably.
Properly sorted, the Smith & Wesson Model 640 Pro Series is a bedside gun you can take to the range and carry (proving you find an appropriate pocket holster). A snubbie(ish) gun that can shoot .357s—should you decide that follow-up shots aren’t as important stopping power.
I’m still happier with my Plain Jane 642 shooting .38s, keeping the money I didn’t spend. But the 640 Pro Series with a trigger job has been elevated from a “no thanks” to a “I wouldn’t say no” revolver.
I think Proust was French
Right you are. My bad. Changed the reference to Heidegger.
I have the same problem with my SP101… and it’s still more accurate than my SR9.
Heidegger? He ain’t heavy; er ist mein Bruder.
Not to diminish the Dave Santurri’s business, but for only $25 and a half hour of your time, you can install Apex Tactical’s J-frame Duty/Carry Kit easily and get essentially the same results.
Note: I don’t work for Apex, but I am a MA gunowner and prefer doing my own gunsmithing…especially considering what we have to deal with here on our M&Ps.
I am a MA gunowner and prefer doing my own gunsmithing
Me too, on both counts, and the first time I tried installing an Apex kit on my M&P 40c, I ended up taking a bunch of parts to my gunsmith in a paper bag.
So is this better than the Ruger SP101?
Undoubtedly, yes. My comment was about the lousy accuracy of the SR9. My little DAO 2″ snubby with the 14LB trigger outshoots the pistol.
Shame…. I like the SP101. Why is it superior?
What is the equivalent to this with an exposed hammer?
A near perfect self protection companion.
Whether in the house or on the street, it’s
dificult to beat the S&W 640.
Comments are closed.