The M16 was as iconic a military weapon as there ever was. When introduced in its original version in 1965, it was a game-changer. We went from the M14’s 30-caliber round to a much smaller .22-caliber round. Some loved it, some didn’t. The rifle was new and basically untried; in some ways, it didn’t perform. But the powers that be worked on it and brought out the A1 and A2 versions, which increased reliability. To this day, it is a rifle that provokes discussion wherever such things are talked about. Springfield Armory jumped on the M16 bandwagon, of sorts, with their introduction of the SA16-A2.
Many readers out there have had experience with the M16 in its various military versions…unfortunately, I was not one of them. My life went a different direction, so I did not serve but I have the utmost respect for all who have served, or are serving, their country. So, it is a different perspective that I bring to the table. I wanted to say that upfront. Many of you have taken M16s apart and reassembled them blindfolded…I respect that. I will go at this review from a civilian shooter’s angle – is this particular rifle a good buy for those looking for an M16-like AR? Let’s find out.
History
We can’t discuss the M16 or any derivative without taking a quick look at the original.
The M16 was the military version of ArmaLite’s AR-15 rifle. Adopted in 1964, the rifle was issued in quantity the next year and was headed to the jungles of Vietnam in short order.
The report card came back a bit dodgy. When issued to troops, the belief went around that the rifles would not need to be cleaned as often as other weapons. The original M16 had no forward assist, and the chamber was not chrome plated. These factors decreased reliability. Additional hits to reliability included rifles not being kept clean and the ammo and powder used at the time. Casualties among our soldiers and Marines were the tragic result. With dirty chambers, cases could get stuck coming out or wouldn’t chamber fully. The problem was with some rifles that there was no way to coax a new cartridge into the fouled chamber until the A1 version came out. Eventually, ammo was also improved by switching to a cleaner-burning powder, which aided reliability.
In 1969, the M16A1 replaced the M14 as the standard-issue military rifle. That version included a forward assist, chrome-plated chamber, a new flash hider, a small “dam” around the mag release to prevent a mag dropping accidentally and some other upgrades. Finally, the rifle came into its own. The A2 version was adopted by the Marines in 1983 with the Army following in 1986. The A2 had additional upgrades over the A1, including the ability to fire the new M855/SS109 5.56mm cartridge.
For a complete rundown of the M16’s history, check it out here.
The SA16-A2
Notice right up front that our example has “A2” in its name. The SA16-A2 is, as the website calls it, a “faithful recreation of the M-16A2, one of the most capable and iconic rifles in history.” While I don’t have the experience with the M16 many of our current and former military readers may have, I appreciate the AR platform. I own several and have always been interested in the M16. I am old enough that I could have served in Vietnam in the early ’70s, and I have friends who did. So, it was with great interest that I received this rifle from Springfield Armory to test.
Specs
BARREL: 20-in. 4150 CMV, Chrome Lined, 1:7
SIGHTS: A2
UPPER RECEIVER: Forged 7075 T6 Aluminum, Type III Hardcoat Anodized, Forward Assist, M4 Feed Ramps
LOWER RECEIVER: Forged 7075 T6 Aluminum, Type III Hardcoat Anodized, Accu-Tite Tension System
BOLT CARRIER GROUP: Enhanced M16 w/ 9310 Steel Bolt, HPT/MPI, Phosphate
GAS SYSTEM: Direct Impingement Rifle-Length, A2 Pinned Gas Block
HANDGUARD A2 Polymer w/ Integral Heat Shield
STOCK: A2 Fixed
TRIGGER: Mil-Spec
MUZZLE DEVICE: A2 Flash Hider
RECEIVER EXTENSION: Mil-Spec Rifle Length
RECEIVER END PLATE: Mil-Spec
BUFFER ASSEMBLY: Rifle
CHARGING HANDLE: GI Style
SAFETY: Single Side 90 Degree
TRIGGER GUARD: Mil-Spec
GRIP: A2
MAGAZINE: (1) GI Aluminum 30-Round
WEIGHT: 7 lbs., 8 oz.
LENGTH: 39.5 in.
MSRP: $1,249
Photos
Here are a few pics showing different aspects of the SA16-A2:
Dust cover. Note the SA logo on the bolt.
Carry handle and rear sight.
Front sight from the top and the flash hider.
Side shot showing bayonet lug
Receiver, left side. Note the engraving “Property Of U.S. Govt.” – interesting!
Right side of the receiver. Note the “Burst” marking. It doesn’t work – I tried! Yeah, I wish. They are just trying to be faithful to the original markings.
Shooting the SA16-A2
We set up targets at 50 yards, not 100, in my backyard range. My OEM eyeballs are not what they once were, especially with the AR’s iron sights.
In my defense, I’ve killed deer with an AR, in 7.62×39 of all calibers, but that was with a nice scope. The carry handle negates the ability to mount a scope in the traditional manner, so if you are a “seasoned citizen” as the late Rush Limbaugh used to call us with eyeballs to match, you might want to bear that in mind.
I wasn’t concerned about the accuracy issue, Springfield Armory makes some nice Ars, and they have a reputation for putting bullet holes close together on the target. Heck, I’ve not met any AR in recent history that wasn’t at least a 1.5-MOA shooter by those with better eyes or an optic mounted. The Picatinny rails on other ARs make mounting an optic easy. That’s one downside to having a dedicated carry handle installed, as I just mentioned above. Carry handles that attach to a Pic rail give you the best of both worlds, in my opinion.
At any rate, I put bullets downrange. I shot three different types of ammo that I had on hand: two 55-grain factory loads and one 50-grain FMJ handload. The factory loads were a Winchester 5.56 Target & Practice load and an Armscor 55-grain ball load. The handload was a 50-grain Hornaday V-Max Moly over 25 grains of WC-846, a military pull-down powder equivalent to BL-(C)2. They were assembled on a Dillon XL-750 progressive press that had been sent to me for review. It did a great job cranking out those loads.
Garmin Xero C1 Sidenote
I set up my Garmin Xero C1 Pro chronograph on the bench behind and to the side of the muzzle. If you don’t have this Garmin chrono, you might consider saving your pennies and buying one. It is by far the easiest-to-use chronograph I’ve owned, and I’ve owned a few. No downrange sensors, no wires, no sky screens – just a Go-Pro-camera-sized plastic box on a tiny tripod on your bench that does all sorts of ballistic math magic and can export your data via Bluetooth to your phone, and thence your laptop. I’d dreamed of something like this for years, and I finally was able to buy one and fulfill that dream of owning a wireless, radar chrono.
As I said above, I am not the best shot in the room with an AR and iron sights, but at least you’ll get an idea of what the rife is capable of in better hands. The rifle performed as expected. The trigger broke cleanly with very little take-up or creep and was better than many other AR triggers I’ve encountered.
Here are some targets and other info. I got ballistic data on two of the loads and will show that with the target.
Some Results
Winchester Target & Practice – I did not collect data for this load. In terms of accuracy, we might want to keep looking. This target, at least, was not the best and representative of others with this ammo.
Armscor
Average Speed: 3230.9
Std. Deviation: 5.4
A low SD helps keep things consistent. This particular group might have been better if I had been more consistent!
Handload
Average Speed: 3131.5
Std. Deviation: 49.1
The high SD works against this load, but in some ways, with this target at least, it is the most consistent one.
Who Is This Rifle For?
With the forty-zillion AR rifles, carbines and pistols out there now, how exactly does this SA16-A2 fit in? Who is the intended market? I think the answer to the last question is fairly obvious. As I said above, I’ve been interested in the M16 for years, and not having military experience with one only made it all the more appealing to me. So, I think I can safely say that this rifle will appeal to shooters who have had experience with the real deal – and also those who have not had that experience but always wanted to shoot one, like me. Even though this rifle has no “Burst” mode, it is pretty close in its specs, looks and handling to an earlier version M16. I am sure that there are differences…those who have had experience with the real M16, please feel free to comment below. But, for most intents and purposes, this rifle will fill the bill for a civilian version of the old tried ‘n true.
Summing Up
If you, like me, have wanted to own a civilian version of the venerable M16, you might want to give this Springfield Armory version a look. In terms of a shootable, well-made civvie AR in the M16 mold, this rifle works. Even without the usual 15-inch Picatinny rail on top, you will find accessories for this rifle that will enhance your shooting experience if you desire to do so. The M16 has given “birth” to a myriad of AR-pattern rifles…why not take a look at a rifle similar to the one that started it all?
Need Ammo? Check out Ammo To Go, the ammunition retail sponsor of TTAG gun reviews and simply a cool online place to fulfill all your ammo needs.
You aware can mount a scope to the A2?
As: https://www.brownells.com/optics/rings-mounts/scope-bases/m16a1a2-scope-mounts/
ACOGs had a few options as well.
I put one of these on my Bushmaster XM-15 e2s. They were on sale for under $300.
COLT AR-15/M16 COLT™ 4X RETRO CARRY HANDLE SCOPE
https://www.brownells.com/optics/scopes/rifle-scopes/ar-15m16-colt-4x-retro-carry-handle-scope/
Yeah, I know you can. I was referring to the “normal” Pic rail installation. Of course, you can mount an optic if you like. I simply like it “bare naked” with the irons, for around our neck of the woods.
Colt SAA is an icon. 1911, definite icon! And now Mattel is an icon.
Time marches on.
I built a mutt A2esque gun. I really want an a1 style barrel, and it has triangle hand guards. An air force style upper would be cool but I guess a cartridge jammer is all right.
SA? no thanks. plenty of good makers of this sort of rifle already out there.
RE: “The carry handle negates the ability to mount a scope in the traditional manner”
In the traditional manner however the handle slot attached scopes work so to speak, I believe those are 4X. Nonetheless it is nice to see a fixed stock, all mine are A1 length. SA did well making it look period with the receiver handle and off color sight tower, handguard, lug, etc. Not being in hand it appears to be a decent investment rifle at a fair MSRP. IMO It’s for a buyer looking for a rifle they can love as is otherwise it’s build your own.
Does anyone remember the creepy maintenance instructions in an R-rated comic book format that referred to the M-16 as the “Sweet Sixteen?”
Nice toy.
However; my bugout gun will remain either my M-1A Scout or my HK-91. If I am not in a hurry, I’ll take my Barrett .50 BMG as well.
I have that PS Maintenance Monthly booklet. The armor had probably every PS that ever was made. He had multiple copies of that one and gave it to me.
The format was a bit cheesy but it did deliver good info.
Elmer, a tip of my hat. An H&K 91 is my last chance, no shit, head for the hills rifle. Although, my M1-A wouldn’t be a bad second. You can have that factory muzzle brake on the scout though. A friend bought one. We took it to the range once. He changed to a standard M-14 flash suppressor post haste.
Several years ago I found a sweet gun-show deal on a complete Colt A2 upper. It has landed on a few different lowers since. There’s something about that rifle I just like.
Fortunately, as I have what is essentially this rifle, I don’t have to consider giving $ to SA.
you over paid bud. I was there with you, you paid way more than what you should have but no worries, keep building this house of lies. I was there, stop acting like you got the deal of the decade because you didn’t.
Right, you were there at some unnamed place at some indeterminate time standing by some unknown person (what was written on the T-shirt of the guy I bought it from? Why does that question matter? Did it have any influence on the transaction?). I never said I got the deal of the decade (wasn’t even this decade) I just said I got a good deal, and, I did. How do you know I overpaid? What did I pay?
I have no idea what kind of bug crawled up your ass but, you might want to go see a doctor about it.
I’m waiting for PSA to make a cheap milspec version after the NFA/GCA are overturned.
Is the barrel profile under the guards the GI profile or the HBAR profile? Asking out of curiosity.
anyone tryna send me some monies?
I was one of the last to train in OSUT with the A1 version along with the M-113 APC. When we got to our duty assignments we never saw either ever again. I liked them both and would someday like to have both in my collection…after the NFA and GCA are overturned.
By hoth I mean thr A1 and A2 M-16 -not thr 113. That was the worst skid-steer loader I ever drove. No bucket or backhoe and super heavy and slow.
Reminds me of the article Peter Kokalis wrote for SOF many years ago. “Bushmaster Builds a Better AR” or something like that. So I bought one. It was just another AR. They all are.
Well yeah once you get to the upgrades of the M16 A3/A4 and M4A1 era it’s basically all modern AR’s where if you are paying over a grand it better be damn close to a 1MOA rifle.
At the time we hated the 16A1. If I could get one now for cheap would I? Hell yes!
Several companies brought “vintage” AR variants (complete guns, uppers and lowers) to market in th last decade. Springfield is a bit late with this one. Gotta say my old Colt with fixed charging handle upper doesn’t see much daylight. I have the handle mounted scope and the sholder stock over-molded cheek riser that allows charging handle operation: BUT it’s just too damn tall, hight above bore axis terrible. This was all a “good” fix at the time, if you wanted a scope. Check the box for a nostalgia buy IF your going to stick to the A2 iron sights. Otherwise: a flat top may better serve a avid shooter/buyer.
S&W wants a bit too much money for this. So, I guess I’ll keep my old Colt rifle.
Of course, I would be more interested if I didn’t already have a couple full length, solid stock rifles.
Would have been nice to know what accuracy the gun is capable of at 100yds with a scope and possibly a 2 stage trigger. Priced about the same as the Colt HBAR or whatever it is called these days. I bought one a couple years ago with the idea I would try and shoot irons at 100yds at 64 yrs of age and have been wearing glasses since the 4th grade. Ha! Put a scope on it, 2 stage Rock River trigger and with good handloads it will shoot sub MOA off the bench.
I scored Expert rating with a M16-A2 service rifle.
Hated that rifle then, hate it and all the AR varients now.
A fun gun!
Sign up for an Appleseed shoot and learn how to shoot your rifle to the rifleman’s standard.
Your targets are screaming that your elbow wasn’t under the barrel. If you shot those with a rest then you really need help.
Yeah, I wasn’t on my game that day. Thanks for the comment!
Springfield is still dead to me, no matter what excuses they make. Do not forget.
Comments are closed.