Gun legislation and further attacks on the Second Amendment never came up in the now famous debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, a debate that marked the beginning of the end for Biden’s political career. Nor was mention of firearms barely uttered during the Republican National Convention or in the early days of the campaign as well. What a change in a candidate makes as the issue is now front and center with the ascension of the left-leaning Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee and her selection of even lefter-leaning Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate. 

Barely had the sweat dried on his hand from holding Harris’s mitt so tightly after she named him her vice-presidential choice, than an old video of the guv was shared on social media with him waddling in front of a crowd and crowing about how he was going to ban AR-style weapons. 

Usually when an old video clip appears of a candidate openly lying to constituents it is leaked by the opposing party. But Harris and Walz’s campaign team are actually making it easy for everyone to see the lies…and to see what these people really stand for.

The Video

In the video from a 2018 gubernatorial stump speech Walz gave and that Harris’s campaign posted on X Tuesday, shows the turncoat politician talking about how he gave money back to NRA after he gladly took it to get elected in his first run for office.

“I’ll take my kick in the butt for the NRA. I spent 25 years in the Army and I hunt and I gave the money back and I’ll tell you what I have been doing: I’ve been voting for common sense legislation that protects the Second Amendment, but we can do background checks, we can do CDC research, we can make sure we don’t have reciprocal carry among states and we can make sure that those weapons of war that I carried in war is the only place where those weapons are at,” Walz says in the video.

So many lies in one statement. But, then what would anybody expect from a politician who began his political career on a lie.

According to Forbes, before becoming governor, Walz got elected to Congress representing a rural district in Minnesota in which he hyped his support for the Second Amendment, talked about how he liked to hunt so of course, that meant he was all about guns, and was also in the military so of course, he was naturally all about guns for that reason, too. He presented that façade to get elected in a district made up of mostly God-fearing, gun-owning stand-up Americans with morals and a strong sense of self-reliance, a common characteristic among our rural communities. He even earned an “A” rating from the NRA, something some Democrats, typically those from rural districts, once routinely earned. It has become increasingly rare, however, for a Democrat to earn a positive rating from the organization in today’s political climate.

It was when Walz ran for governor of Minnesota in 2018 that his stance suddenly changed. For he then had to appeal to urbanites in the Twin Cities, and suddenly his true colors shined through…and the real lies began.

Spicing Up His Military Record

Of the biggest lie garnering attention from the resurfaced video, Walz states, “we can make sure that those weapons of war that I carried in war is the only place where those weapons are at.” Walz did serve honorably in the military for 24 years, initially in the Nebraska Army National Guard and then in the Minnesota Army National Guard. But the problem is, he never saw combat.

In fact, since he was chosen as the Democratic Party vice presidential nominee, a number of his fellow service members have spoken critically of Walz because the fact is, not only did he never serve in combat as he has claimed, but he actually retired early allegedly to avoid having to go to Iraq with his unit, which was set to be deployed in 2005.

“We all did what we were supposed to do, we did the right thing, and it’s dishonorable what he did,” Tom Schilling, who was a member of Walz’s unit told Fox News. “He left somebody else to take over his spot. He just ditched us.”

Fellow service member, Ret. Command Sgt. Maj. Thomas Behrends was even more critical when interviewed on “The Ingraham Angle.”

Behrends noted that not only did Walz never see combat as he has claimed, but he also was not a command sergeant major as his governor’s website states in his biography.

“To most people, that would mean that he was actually in combat, carrying a weapon in a combat zone and getting combat pay and in a dangerous and hostile environment where he is getting shot at,” Behrends told host Laura Ingraham.

Tim Walz at Ft. Benning, Georgia in 1981. U.S. Army Photo

In fact, Walz would have been a command sergeant major, but he never deployed and he retired before completing the work to hold on to that rank so was administratively demoted as a master sergeant.

Trump vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance, who did serve Iraq as a U.S. Marine, has also been vocal about Walz’s embellishments.

“As a Marine who served his country in uniform when the United States Marine Corps, when the United States of America asked me to go to Iraq to serve my country, I did it. I did what they asked me to do, and I did it honorably,” Vance said. “When Tim Walz was asked by his country to go to Iraq, you know what he did? He dropped out of the Army and allowed his unit to go without him, a fact that he’s been criticized for aggressively by a lot of the people that he served with.”

Two Lies and the Painful Truth

Beyond spicing up his military record to make him sound like more of an authority on firearms and earn the respect often reserved for true combat veterans, Walz and his statements offer a host of additional problems for gun owners and a glimpse into a man with an apparently flawed character for the rest of America:

• In the video, he uses the perpetual Democratic buzzword every politician uses when they talk about passing “gun legislation” and that buzzword is “common sense.” Unfortunately, when a Democrat uses the words “common sense” in conjunction with gun legislation, it means anything but common sense. More often than not, it means “ill- or uninformed” legislation that will serve more to restrict people who committing the majority, if any, crimes, leave citizens more helpless to defend themselves, make the shooting sports and hunting more costly and difficult to enjoy and will undeniably take another step in eroding the Second Amendment freedoms of Americans. Common sense is a buzzword intended for the portion of our nation’s electorate that doesn’t have any. Democrats say the words trusting that most people are uninformed and don’t care and will take what they say at face value…and then will vote accordingly. 

• In addition to misleading the audience on his military service, Walz also makes sure to say he “hunts.” As if that gives him some sort of pass or puts him on a moral high ground to speak knowledgeably about firearms. Whether he actually hunts or not, and as wonderful an American tradition as hunting is, enjoyed by millions (including myself), the Second Amendment was not put in place by the framers of the constitution so Americans would be permitted to hunt. When a politician emphasizes that he hunts in the same breath he begins talking about gun legislation, that is his or her way of saying, “I’m one of you and I know all about guns and use them myself, and I’m not afraid to restrict the use of guns, so why should you be?” It’s disingenuous and condescending and every American sportsman and gun owner should be offended when a politician makes such statements.

• The only lies Walz didn’t deliver in that brief video clip was his feeling toward firearms…he wants to restrict them. He was clear he wants universal background checks, a well-meaning sounding, but ineffective, costly and even nefarious effort to restrict guns from those who pose the least risk to others; he wants to fund research through the CDC that has historically been used to attack gun ownership, research that time and again has been found to be politically motivated and flawed in its methodology; and he’s even against reciprocity among states, which allows people with concealed carry permits from one state to carry and keep themselves safe when traveling in other states. The last one is the biggest headscratcher as permit holders have already been vetted by the government in order to get a permit. In opposing reciprocity or seeking to eliminate it, a legislator isn’t creating a law that will stop a criminal (a criminal isn’t worried about a permit), he or she is merely attacking law abiding gun owners and legal gun ownership. If anything, you are trying to turn a class of citizens who do everything to follow the law into criminals you can go after. It’s government overreach in its most blatant and zealous form. 

The Real Threat to Democracy

Tim Walz clearly hates guns or at the very least legal gun ownership, and in him Harris has found the perfect bedfellow as together they will likely continue to construct a campaign built on lies and increased attacks on legal gun ownership. 

But the Democrats are right about one thing. 

In attacking Donald Trump as the Republican candidate for presidency, they have repeatedly invoked the specter that “democracy is under threat like never before.”

It is under threat. But it is not Donald Trump America needs to fear. 

With the selection of Harris and Walz for the 2024 ticket, Democrats have signaled politically that they are going all in on the destruction of America. They have enthusiastically chosen two candidates that will solidify the progressive stranglehold on the party and strive to build even more division among our nation’s citizens. 

No, the real threat to democracy is clear. The real threat is the Democratic Party. The real threat is Kamala Harris and Tim Walz.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

83 COMMENTS

  1. True, but nobody cares. Dims will turn out and vote for a talking Chihuahua with rabies, if that is what’s on the ticket.

      • In the (I hope) unlikely event they have been voting Dem, they will continue to do so, is my prediction.

        IMO, nobody be changing their vote for nuthin’…

        “Besides, we never had a non-senile Pekinese President before, this is our chance to make history…”

    • This is the party of Da Nang Dick Blumenthal, after all. And before him, Tom Harkin. And then there’s Elizabeth Warren… so what’s a little BS resume padding?

      Anyway, remember when Dan Quayle was a coward and shirker for serving in the National Guard? And how Dubya was a draft dodger because he flew fighters in the ANG? Ah, but now the Guard is honorable service. Guess it just depends on who’s doing it, right?

  2. Hell, forget “restricting”, Harris and Walz would love nothing more than to get rid of the Second Amendment entirely, round up all gun owners, and yes, shoot us if we do not comply. So what if it starts a war, these demons are serious about their end goals of civilian disarmament. And if it means bringing in UN or Chinese troops (or illegals) to finish the job, so be it. They are not going to care if they cannot stack the U.S. Supreme Court to their liking, or if the House and Senate do not rule in their favor. They will simply pull an Obama, and whatever the hell they want anyway. Executive Orders will rule the day, and they will tell gun owners where to shove their 2nd Amendment, non-rights.

    • Shadow,

      The recent en-banc decision from the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals demonstrates clearly that Democrats in the judiciary can and will contradict / violate clear law. (And why not, those judges will not pay any personal penalties.) Why wouldn’t Democrats do the same if they control the Executive Branch? After all, the Executive Branch is responsible for enforcing law: why would Democrats, controlling the Executive Branch, enforce laws against Democrats doing the bidding of the Democrat Party? Answer: they will not.

      I remind everyone about the showdown between the U.S. Supreme Court and the Executive Branch back in 1832 when the Supreme Court (Chief Justice John Marshall at the time) issued a ruling on a case and the President (Andrew Jackson at the time) reportedly responded, “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!” President Andrew Jackson was telling the entire nation in crystal clear terms that he and thus the Executive Branch REFUSED follow the law and the U.S. Constitution.

      So, it really doesn’t matter what the law is or what rulings the U.S. Supreme Court hands down to us if the Executive Branch refuses to enforce them. Stew on that for a while–it sure looks like Democrats have been.

      • “So, it really doesn’t matter what the law is or what rulings the U.S. Supreme Court hands down to us if the Executive Branch refuses to enforce them.”

        Isn’t that pretty much what we’ve seen since the Heller, McDonald and Bruen decisions??? We are told we have the rights, but who is going to send the US Marshals to CA, IL, MA, NY, etc to enforce them?

        Lawsuits are all well and good, but a “win” that turns into a worthless judgment is not a win. America needs to either throw out politicians who have proven they hate the Constitution and the liberties they describe abd insure for all citizens and elect new candidates or continue to move into the dustbin of history. Regardless of your cynicism as to how you believe the democrat voters will act, or what they’ll vote for, don’t sit around whining. Make sure you vote, your family members vote, your drinking pals vote, and anyone else who’d rather have something to complain about than get off their rear end and make a commitment. Tossing a little money in the direction of conservative candidates, as well as volunteering to help a campaign would be a plus as well. Act as you say you believe, it could become contagious.

    • @shadow – “shoot us if we do not comply”

      Typically, lots of folks get shot, mostly former allies. The preferred method in the main is starvation and compliance is the precursor to it. So many folks in the last 120 years have complied in the hope of survival, and died of starvation…

      The target is 30%, give or take.

      • The target is 30%, give or take”

        That’s the neo-maoists – the cutting edge extinction-commies want to kill everybody…

  3. >Trump says something that’s wrong for whatever reason.

    Media: He’s a LIAR!!! LIAR!!!! LIAR!!!!! LIAR!!!!!! HE’S LYING TO YOU!!!!!

    >Harris, Walz, any Democrat that intentionally deceives

    Media: You’re just taking them out of context. You know what they meant to say. Stop being racist!! Actually, Trumps the liar.

  5. Lies and incompetence. This is what you get when you vote Democrat. Don’t be a rube. Don’t let them trick you into believing otherwise.

    • napresto,

      I am thoroughly convinced that many Democrats actively and intentionally try to advance chaos, misery, and suffering. That goes way beyond mere lies and incompetence.

      I liken many such Democrats to abusive husbands who, after literally beating their wives into submission, become bored (since there is no challenge any more). In order to combat the boredom, such abusive husbands resort to trying to coerce their wives into “accepting” ever more strange and horrible abuse, even going so far as ordering their wives to have $ex with strangers while the husband watches or order the wife to watch the husband have $ex with strangers. The abusive husband who goes that far is no longer simply “lying” or being “incompetent”: rather he is intentionally trying to make his wife suffer for sick entertainment. I see significant parallels in many Democrats.

      And if my previous paragraph does not convince you, consider the Roman Colosseum where crowds went to watch an estimated 400,000 people die (over the course of about 350 years) for entertainment. Mechanisms of death included gladiators fighting other gladiators, gladiators killing slaves and/or prisoners, and animals killing prisoners in a savage form of execution. If many Romans viewed suffering and death as entertainment, why wouldn’t many Democrats today do the same?

      • RE: “I liken many such Democrats to abusive husbands who, after literally beating their wives into submission, become bored (since there is no challenge any more).”

        grasshopper…Failure to Define Gun Control by its Diabolical History in courtrooms, on forums, to newspaper editors, for legislators, etc. is like the gutless wonder who hears his neighbor’s wife and kids getting beaten and fails to say or do anything.

      • The best way to understand democrats is in their rabid wanton desire to kill babies simply because they are inconvenient to their preferred lifestyle choice. While refusing to put to death violent murders and child sexual predators.

      • If they were competent, they would have destroyed this great country already! They’ve had 100+ years to do it, ever since that crushing failure Woodrow Wilson held office and started the ongoing parade of lies.

        On the other hand, you’ll see no argument from me that leftists don’t hate this country and actively want to undermine it.

  6. Quit using the word “progressive” to describe these lunatics. They’re COMMUNISTS, through and through.

    • Johnny LeBlanc,

      By happenstance I heard most of Walz’s speaking:
      1) After he and several state governors visited the Whitehouse to assess Biden
      2) After Kamala officially introduced him at her coming-out (of sorts) rally

      First of all, I noticed how enthusiastic–even giddy–he is to tow the Party line. Second, I noticed that he is quite willing to say anything, even bold-faced lies, without hesitation and with a big old smile on his face. Third, I realized that he comes from a very modest middle-class background. When you combine all of those, the most logical conclusion in my opinion is that he is a nobody who will do anything and everything that the true Democrat Party Power Brokers tell him to do, because without the True Power Brokers’ support, he is nothing and will be out in the cold. (He does not come from a political family power dynasty or Big Money so he is quite literally nothing outside of political office.)

      My conclusion above tells me that he is the most dangerous type of politician there is because he is nothing more than a stooge for the True Power Brokers who operate in the shadows. And being nothing more than a stooge, he has no ability to stand on his own and thus no ability to stand on principle when it contradicts the whims of the True Power Brokers. And because the True Power Brokers are in the shadows, they will never face any backlash or accountability for advancing any policies, no matter how heinous or destructive those policies may be.

      For reference I view Kamala much the same way as Walz which means they are even more dangerous as a pair since neither one would ever stand against the whims of the Democrat Party’s True Power Brokers.

      • By the way my above comment lays out how and why Harris and Walz can be true Communists in ever sense of the word.

      • The True Power Brokers?? Obama, Valerie Jarret, and Eric Holder. These are the America hating commies that are behind everything. They should be arrested for treason. Why aren’t they?? Why doesn’t some red state AG indict these frauds?? Because Republicans are PU!$$!IES.

      • The horse juice stomach pump.thing is a hoax invented in response to the multiple times this “gentleman” has knowingly spread the hoax about JD Vance and the couch during his own press conferences.

        So I figure it’s fair.game to smear this AWalz valor-thief with impunity.

        • The problem is how plausible such things get with degens in the commie camp, giddyap I guess.

    • It’s all based on Marxism or other tyrannical ism’s.

      They want us disarmed so they can more easily rule us.

      • We are the carbon they want to reduce. Can’t have challenges to their narrative let alone power as the house of cards comes apart under even passive competition as they run out of other people’s resources.

        • That talking point is probably already on some radical environmentalist group’s discussion list.

          Eliminate carbon emissions by eliminating people.

          There’s one ultra radical group who want to reduce global population to 100 million. A more extremist group wants to reduce global human population to 100,000.

          • ls it ironic that the window for preventing catastrophic climate change by reducing or eliminating co2 emissions closed 15 or 20 years ago?

            The deep ocean is warming, and seawater EXSOLVES co2 into the atmosphere as it warms, which causes more warming. Eliminating the tech economy that *might possibly* allow us as a species to engineer our way out of our current frog-in-a-pot future will eliminate the last shed of hope.

            So is it surprising that these “degrow” groups suddenly appear advocating we do just that? Whst surprises me is that I don’t find it at all surprising.

      • Congratulations, Nikita!! You’ve obviously figured out what STILL escapes Dear Debbie Dimwit!!! While blacks in American endured slavery (historical fact), SLAVERY has been practiced on every continent in the world (except, as far as I know, Antarctica), and against EVERY race. Often it is de jure, but it is present de facto, EVERYWHERE, and has been throughout history. It seems we allow our own (admitted) failings in this regard to blind us to . . . pretty much all of human history.

        But, good on you for providing another voice to rub Debbie’s nose in her own poop.

  9. It’s too bad he didn’t apply his “common sense” BEFORE he shamed his otherwise honorable service with his stolen valor and his misleading comments about his final pay grade…

  10. Left leaning? If that woman is left leaning then Fidel Castro was a middle of the road guy and Vladimir Lennon was barely left of center.

  11. The dude’s a total POS, but he can rightfully call himself a Seargeant Major. He was an E8 working in an E9’s slot. He was frocked/pinned at his unit. He wore the rank and was performing the duties of that rank. He was paid as an E9/Seargeant Major. Every person in his unit would have called him “Sergeant Major”. However, he did not attend the Sergeant Major academy by the time he retired so his retirement rank would be E8.

    • BS he was only an acting SM.on condition of meeting the requirements. He failed to do so and thus fails to be considered to be a SM henceforth.

      • Ridiculous. He never received orders to attend the Sergeant Major Academy. He fulfilled every legal obligation required of him and the United States Army.

    • You guys are confusing SM with CSM. As reported, sounds he was assigned as a BN SM 1-125FA BN. Somewhere MN Guard was frocking him as a CSM, perhaps as 1BDE CSM?

      I read the situation as the Div/BDE as happy to get rid of the SOB as they allowed him to retire vs being retained for deployment (useless dirtbag). If he was any good he would not have been allowed to retire/would have deployed. No evidence of hardship.

      He was a cannon cocker in Neb guard for 15yrs. Where is the history for that? Likely should have made E7 in that time. Which in Combar Arms would likely require a Secret clearance. Certainly, for E8. Which would prohibit (multiple) gadfly trips to chicomland (as reported Walz is yet ANOTHER demtard chicom lover).

      https://www.factcheck.org/2024/08/attacks-on-walzs-military-record/

    • JW, please stop confusing them with the actual facts of his rank, you are interrupting their Two Minute Hate.

      • Don’t act like you have any idea what the truth is. You’re a pathological liar so divorced from the truth that you could never recognize it.

      • And YOU, MajorLiar, are a lying Leftist/fascist idiot propagandist. HE. RETIRED. AS. A. MASTER SERGEANT (E8). BECAUSE. HIS. “PROMOTION”. TO. CSM. WAS. “PROVISIONAL”. AND. EXPRESSLY. CONDITIONAL. (completing various requirements, including CSM academy, which he NEVER COMPLETE).

        His “promotion” was revoked for failure to meet EXPRESS requirements. It was made specifically in anticipation of Afghan deployment. His Unit had received its deployment orders TWO MONTHS before he submitted his retirement papers.

        He cut and ran BECAUSE his unit was going to be deployed. He NEVER completed the requirements for his “promotion”, so he was AUTOMATICALLY demoted to his ACTUAL rank when he submitted his (cowardly) retirement. He is, and always was, an E8 at his highest actual rank, and retired at that rank. He got a PROVISIONAL, CONDITIONAL, promotion, for which he NEVER satisfied the requirement (and never actually served in that role).

        STOP FREAKIN’ LYING, MAJORLIAR!!! He signed legislation including pedophiles as a class protected for MN protection for protected class status. He signed (and spoke in favor of, and helped pass) legislation to make it possible to remove children from their parents’ custody if the parents DARED to oppose them getting radical, dangerous “treatments” that could sterilize them for life, and even permanently mutilate them, in pursuit of the demented Leftist/fascist “chosen gender” nonsense. He was CONVICTED of driving drunk (approx. DOUBLE the legal limit), going 95 mph in a 55 zone. He/the Harris Campaign, even overstated his coaching achievements (he was NEVER head coach). Kamala Harris has now (through her campaign surrogates; she doesn’t have the guts to make these statements herself) literally reversed her position on most, if not all, of her MAJOR platform issues in 2020, to what she is having her spokemonkeys say, now. SHE. HAS. NO!!!. POSITION. OR. PLATFORM. STATEMENTS. ON. HER. CAMPAIGN. WEBSITE!!!! (And “early voting” starts in 3 weeks, in some states.)

        They are lying, Leftist/fascist Dimocrats – you can tell they are lying, because their lips are moving.

        Yes, Donald Trump lies, frequently. Senile Joe Biden began and made his political career on lies, and never held a policy position that he wouldn’t abandon like a dirty sock. Kamala has never had a “firm” policy position (other than on her knees or on her back) in her life. (Tampon Tim fits right in, don’t he???)

        And you remain embarrassingly pathetic, and too stupid to insult.

  12. I fully support that the same weapons I used in combat, actually in a Country outside of Italy, should be carried by American Citizens. M16s, M60s, M249s, and the such are covered by the 2A.

    The Continental Army had lesser weapons that most of the Citizenry and Militia when the Constitution was written. The men who wrote the Constitution knew this and yet they said nothing against civilians having those weapons.

    As far as Waltz, he was probably a Sand Hilton soldier when he was at Benning, the soft head gives it away.

      • I can definitely bear a Claymore mine. I’ve done it myself. I’ve carried it. I’ve set it up, I’ve manually set it off. All by myself. I’d call that an individually bearable arm.

      • Civilians had cannons, I don’t see anything man portable or crew served as exempted by the 2A.

    • Trooper,

      As a matter of philosophy, I agree with you wholeheartedly. Now let’s talk practical . . . forget, for a moment, whether the government has any “right” or any properly GRANTED power, to do so, the government (state, federal, local, you name it) simply lacks any ABILITY to do so. And while that includes acknowledging that black markets for ANYTHING humans want and are willing to pay for exist, it isn’t limited to that.

      Many on this site talk about their ability to build firearms from parts (either purchased or manufactured at home), and that is very real (I’ve done it myself, a few times). But then the gun-grabber idiots will yell, “We’ll outlaw your ability to buy those parts!! We’ll make ‘80% lowers’ and gun-kits ILLEGAL!!” Yeah, there’s that whole “black market” thing, again. But more importantly, anyone with a halfway-decent hobbyist machine shop can make a gun (haven’t tried that . . . yet).

      “Okay! So we’ll just outlaw people owning machine tools (and 3D printers, and hobbyist CNC milling machines, and . . . hand tools???? A good metalsmith can make a fully functional firearm with HAND TOOLS. You get the idea.)

      “Well, at LEAST we can prevent you from buying/owning “weapons of mass destruction!!” *sound of loud buzzer* OOPS! Wrong answer, Moosebreath!! No, you can’t. I can make any or all of chemical, biological, or explosive weapons from commonly available materials. As I’ve posted on this site, many times, I can walk into a Home Depot, a good garden store, a drug store, or even a grocery store, with a Benjy in my pocket, and walk out with the materials to make nerve agents, chemical/gas weapons, firearms, or even biological weapons (more complicated, I admit).

      The reality is that you CANNOT stop a determined person (at least a functioning member of the species homo sapiens – many of our fellow Americans are not of that species) from buying, accessing, possessing, or USING a weapon. Sh*t, Cain killed Abel with a ROCK! The idea of “disarming” people is a notion so idiotic, only a Leftist/fascist could even entertain it (or would WANT to!). As long as my brain functions, and I am not a quadriplegic, I am NOT “unarmed”. There are simply some arms that are more efficient than others, but if you deprive me of those . . . you incentivize me to consider my other options, referred to above.

      It is LITERALLY beyond the capability of any government to “disarm” its citizens, and to the extent they try, they simply invite us to consider the wisdom of T. Jefferson’s observation that “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” They REALLY don’t want me thinking about that (but they’re apparently too stupid to know it).

      • Lamp I agree. You and I have a similar knowledge of Home Depot can offer.
        Philosophically we share some of the same beliefs of human nature.

        • Well, you know the (tongue in cheek) definition of a “smart person”? Someone who agrees with me, of course! (It’s a joke, I promise!)

          But, yeah, anyone with the brains to pour p*ss out of a boot can make a gun or an IED. Gas, nerve agents, or poison are a little harder, but still doable. “Banning” guns is an idiot’s pursuit – which is why it is the natural inclination of Leftists.

  15. NO THE DEMOCRATS ARE NOT COMING AFTER YOUR AR15 NOR MY AR15 THE REAL THREAT TO DEMOCRACY
    IS … THE ORANGE TURD , tRUMP AND THE MAGA , Me A Great AaaSSIEHOLE BY tRUMP .

    • SHOUTING SHTHEAD…TAKE YOUR TRUMP SLANDERING AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR STUPID AZZ AND GTF OUT OF TEXAS.

    • NTexas, they have said many times they want to take ARs and other weapons they deem “dangerous “.

      If you believe they do not want to, then you think they are lying? To what end would such a lie serve?

      Democracy does not exist, no form of modern government can be called a Democracy. We are a Republic that has certain Democratic principles, but not a true Democracy. We were not founded to be a Democracy, nor would any sane person want a true Democracy.

      • We’re all way past the point of pretending Democrats aren’t after peoples guns. There are enough clips, transcripts and recorded unhinged rants to prove as much.

        So my question to people who don’t actually believe what the Democrats say and insist they aren’t after your guns is: why vote for liars?

    • Awww, did poor widdle Norte Teah-ass get a concussion when Obamas’ banana slid home and he hit his head on the bottom of the sink in the bathroom?

    • what’s obvious in NTexas post here is he knows the difference between upper case and lower case. So his ALL CAPS SCREAMING AT EVERYONE in his posts are probably intentional…either that or this latest is not the real NTexas because he has never posted in other than all caps with the exception of his user name.

  16. “we can make sure that those weapons of war that I carried in war is the only place where those weapons are at.”

    Really? You carried a civilian market MSR (AKA AR-15) in the military in war? Combat, really?

    Wow! Can ya get any more deceptive?

    The U.S. military has never issued or carried a civilian market MSR (AKA AR-15) in the military and used them in war (e.g. combat).

    And besides, you never even carried a firearm in combat. You have repeated this lie many times. > https://nypost.com/2024/08/08/us-news/tim-walz-falsely-claimed-he-carried-weapons-in-war-in-resurfaced-clip-absolutely-false/

    Ya gonna be claiming ya got purple hearts and all sorts of medals and have Kamala put you in for the MOH also?

  18. BREAKING 2A NEWS: SCOTUS 8-1 DECISION DESTROYS DOJ STRATEGY.

    In the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit a major pro-2A brief has been filed in support of non-violent felon Bryan Range in which its argues that Range should enjoy the right to keep and bear arms despite the existence of 18 USC 922g1. Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner analyzes the legal submission.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGiQEytBQ5A

  21. “This idea that there is supremacy around your right to have and carry and wield, or whatever, at any given part of the day has never been part of what this country is.

    — Democrat Vice President Nominee Tim Walz 2024”

    hate to break it to you Tim, but according to the founders own words there “is supremacy around your right to have and carry and wield, or whatever, at any given part of the day.” Its called the Constitution, that thing we have in our country that is a ‘constitutional republic’ where in a ‘constitutional republic’ the Constitution is the ‘supremacy’ authority. The founders specifically made our country a ‘constitutional republic’, basically, to ensure the Constitution was the ‘supremacy’ authority and not the government or a politician or the majority of the general public like you want it to be in in your touting ‘marxist socialist’ ideals.

    “Tim Walz is telling you that he believes government power supersedes your natural rights, and will do anything he can to pervert those rights to make the US an immoral and authoritarian hellscape.” > https://x.com/gunpolicy/status/1821305315838611513

  22. The moderation is getting really tiring. I posted a comment hours ago and it still not appeared. A comment I posted earlier in the week did not appear until two days later. There have been multiple instances of these happen.

  23. “the left-leaning Kamala Harris”

    JD Vance is far right, but Harris is “left-leaning?” She was judged the most leftist member of the Senate — which has some tough competition. What does a leftist have to do to get labeled “far left” around here?

  24. “What does a leftist have to do to get labeled “far left” around here?”

    Advocate for universal background checks for voters? Call for mandatory gun ownership? Dont know. but if they shoot enough former colleagues and “dissidents”, they become “centrists”, (eg Mao, Fidel, Stalin, Lenin)…

    /s, maybe

  25. Regarding universal background checks, it is instructive to note that the Sandy Hook killer killed his mother to take her guns. 18 states, including NY, IL, and CA, as well as DC (covering about 42% of the U.S. population), already require some form of background checks on all gun sales, including private sales; how has that worked out for CA, DC, IL, and NY?

  26. Saying “it’s common sense” is equivalent to saying “it’s true because I say so”. If it’s sensible, show us your line of reasoning and your data. This “common sense” argument is just a way to prevent actual rational discussion.

Comments are closed.