When it comes to most mainstream media journalists, you can’t blame them for not knowing about firearms. They aren’t – for the most part – “gun people.”
On 60 Minutes, the CBS news program, Bill Whitaker demonstrated the latest frustrating example. He at least asked Vice President Kamala Harris what type of firearm she owned. It was a new and quickly forgotten revelation when she first revealed she was a gun owner in 2019, but has resurfaced recently after she repeated it during the ABC News presidential debate and then told Oprah Winfrey that she’d shoot an intruder if one were to ever break into her home.
The vice president said she owned a Glock and that, yes, she’d been to a shooting range. However, that was the extent of it – Whitaker moved along.
Her answer, though, opens up more questions that are frankly problematic for Vice President Harris and demonstrate again her hypocrisy of targeting law-abiding firearm ownership while ignoring violent criminals.
The vice president should answer a few more questions. Keep in mind, the vice president is a California resident, a state with arguably the strictest gun control laws in the country.
From all appearances, the vice president has a serious case of “Gun control for thee. Not for me.”
Relevant Timeline
In 2019, the vice president – then a U.S. Senator from California running for president herself – told media she owned a handgun and an aide later confirmed that “the handgun was purchased years ago.” The aide also stated the vice president kept the firearm locked up in her Los Angeles home. There’s no pinpoint to that timeframe and the vice president hasn’t provided any additional details. It could mean she purchased her firearm in 2015 or 2000. Stating the firearm was “purchased,” however, does confirm it was not given to her or handed down from family.
The vice president’s professional career also matters to her ability to own a Glock specifically. Harris began her legal career in California in the late 1990s and early 2000s. She started in Alameda County’s district attorney’s office. Next, she was recruited to the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office and later to the Office of the City Attorney of San Francisco. She was then elected District Attorney for San Francisco in 2003, followed by a jump up to California Attorney General in 2010 and winning reelection in 2014.
What’s notable here is that California’s strict handgun possession and purchasing law, the Unsafe Handguns Act (UHA), was enacted in 2001. Glock handguns have largely been prohibited for purchase by the Average Joe in California. Glock Generation 1, 2, 4 and 5, in addition to U.S.-made Glock handguns are all currently prohibited for sale to the general public by California’s restrictions. Only Austrian-made Glock Generation 3 handgun models, which were grandfathered, are currently approved per the Unsafe Handgun Act (UHA).
It is possible Vice President Kamala Harris purchased her Glock before 2001. If you believe that – I have a Golden Gate Bridge to sell you.
What is most likely – if it is in fact true that the vice president purchased at some point in the past 10 or so years and owns a Glock – is that she used the UHA carveout exemption for law enforcement, which included certain employees in the district attorney’s office or later when she was elected as attorney general.
The law states:
“This section shall not apply to any of the following:… (4) The sale or purchase of any pistol, revolver or other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person, if the pistol, revolver, or other firearm is sold to … any district attorney’s office … for use in the discharge of their official duties. Nor shall anything in this section prohibit the sale to, or purchase by, sworn members of these agencies.”
The facts are simple. If the vice president does indeed own a GLOCK handgun in California for purposes of self-defense, she possesses it under a gun control carveout that is not available to millions of law-abiding Californians. By the way – the vice president, as leader of The White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention, is accused of colluding with gun control groups and the City of Chicago to sue GLOCK over allegations that they make unsafe firearms.
But Wait…There’s More
Not only would Vice President Kamala Harris’s GLOCK ownership be a blatant case of “gun control for thee, not for me,” she went even further to try to prohibit private handgun ownership in California.
Not long after the UHA was enacted in California, then-San Fransisco District Attorney Harris forcefully supported Proposition H, a 2005 ballot measure that banned San Francisco residents outright from buying, selling or even possessing handguns. Once again, as with the UHA, Prop. H included exception carveouts for active-duty law enforcement, military and certain licensed security guards. Prop. H was later struck down, but that didn’t stop Harris from supporting more gun control extremes.
At a 2007 press conference, while still serving as San Fransisco District Attorney, Harris told legal gun owners that authorities could “walk into their homes” to inspect whether they were storing their firearms properly under a new proposal she helped draft.
“We’re going to require responsible behaviors among everybody in the community, and just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn’t mean that we’re not going to walk into that home and check to see if you’re being responsible and safe in the way you conduct your affairs,” she said at the time.
Supreme Attempts to Ban
It becomes even more hypocritical for the vice president to say she owns a handgun not available to the California public, given her tenure as a law enforcement official. In 2008, then-DA Harris signed on to a District Attorneys’ friend-of-the-court brief, or amicus brief, in D.C. v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court’s leading Second Amendment case. Heller, of course, was a challenge to Washington, D.C.’s, ban on handgun possession.
That means the vice president’s opinion was that not only could California ban handgun sales and possession, but that the Second Amendment doesn’t preclude total bans on handgun possession. In fact, her brief argues the right to keep and bear arms wasn’t an individual right at all, but that “the Second Amendment provides only a militia-related right to bear arms.”
There are almost too many levels of hypocrisy to count regarding the revelation Vice President Kamala Harris owns a Glock handgun stored in her private home back in California. There are almost too many instances to recount regarding her current gun control positions that deny Americans self-defense even as she enjoys around-the-clock armed security.
The vice president is attempting to score political points in the last few weeks before Election Day and trying her best to persuade gun owners she’s one of them. The problem is, she’s the living encapsulation of gun control’s fundamental hypocrisy: Gun control for thee, not for me.
“colluding with gun control groups and the City of Chicago to sue GLOCK“
There’s no problem with the Fed and the state discussing potential lawsuits, federal and state agencies often collaborate to ensure uniformity of efforts.
Hey, Donald Trump has been colluding with the Heritage foundation to install himself as a fascist dictator, that’s the real problem with project 2025.
Trump has specifically disavowed Project 2025 multiple times. He has never even read it, and neither have you, or any of the other ignorant fearmongers running around propagating this lie. That means you’re spreading disinformation.
Miner, the people you want to give power to have been constantly telling us that you have no right to spread disinformation. They want to use the power of the state to come in behind you and erase your speech, and even hold you accountable for your misdeeds. How do you feel about not having the freedom to say what you want to say?
“Trump has specifically disavowed Project 2025 multiple times“
Yes, that has been his claim recently.
He also claimed he was introducing a healthcare plan better than Obamacare in two weeks… Nine years ago.
How about some facts:
“What We Know About Trump’s Link To Project 2025—As Author Claims Ex-President ‘Blessed It’ In Secret Recording
Alison Durkee
Forbes Staff
Alison is a senior news reporter covering US politics and legal news.
Aug 15, 2024,12:34pm EDT
TOPLINE One of the authors of Project 2025 claimed former President Donald Trump has “blessed” the project and is “very supportive of what we do,” according to a secret recording released Thursday—the latest report tying Trump to Project 2025 even as the ex-president has publicly disavowed it.
Donald Trump Heritage Foundation
President Donald Trump speaks at the Heritage [+]
Foundation’s annual President’s Club meeting on Oct. 17, 2017 in Washington.
Project 2025 is a multi-pronged effort spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, with help from other conservative organizations, aimed at preparing for the next conservative administration—namely a second Trump administration—which has primarily garnered criticism for its 900-page policy blueprint proposing a total overhaul of the executive branch, which was first released last year.
Trump decried Project 2025 on Truth Social in July, saying he has “nothing to do with them” and calling some of its ideas “absolutely ridiculous and abysmal,” and his campaign advisor Chris LaCivita has also slammed the group and called the operation “a pain in the ass” to the Trump campaign—even as ties have emerged between the ex-president, his running mate Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, and the Heritage Foundation.
Russell Vought: The left-wing Centre for Climate Reporting published secret footage Thursday of two people posing as donors and speaking with Vought—a former Trump administration staffer who runs a right-wing group and authored a chapter of Project 2025—who said he’s “not worried” about Trump distancing himself from Project 2025, claiming the ex-president “blessed” the project and “is very supportive of what we do.”
Kevin Roberts: Trump flew on a private jet with Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts in 2022, the Washington Post reported, before speaking at a Heritage Foundation event, and he also praised Roberts in a February speech as “doing an unbelievable job.”
Public Comments: Trump publicly cheered the Heritage Foundation’s policy work in the past, saying in 2022—before Project 2025’s agenda was released—that the organization was “going to lay the groundwork and detail plans for exactly what our movement will do … when the American people give us a colossal mandate.”
Project 2025 Briefing: Roberts told the Post in April he had briefed Trump on Project 2025, saying he “personally [has] talked to President Trump about Project 2025 … because my role in the project has been to make sure that all of the candidates who have responded to our offer for a briefing on Project 2025 get one from me.”
JD Vance: Roberts has even closer ties to Vance, with the Heritage leader telling Politico in March the senator was “absolutely going to be one of the leaders—if not the leader—of our movement” and saying after Vance was named as Trump’s running mate that the Heritage Foundation had been privately “really rooting” for him to be the pick.
Kevin Roberts’ Book: Vance also wrote the foreword to Roberts’ forthcoming book outlining “a peaceful ‘Second American Revolution’” for conservative voters, in which Vance reportedly quotes Roberts as saying, “It’s time to circle the wagons and load the muskets” and praises the Heritage Foundation as “the most influential engine of ideas for Republicans from Ronald Reagan to Donald Trump.”
Project 2025 Authors: More than 140 former members of the Trump administration are involved with Project 2025, according to CNN, including six of his former Cabinet secretaries—and several people authored chapters whom the Post reports Trump has suggested could be in his second administration, including former advisor Peter Navarro, former Housing Secretary Ben Carson and former acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller.“
That’s your conspiracy theory.
How about the one where a vegetable, joe biden, was installed in the oval office? Whoever is actually running the country was never voted on.
….and the same applies to her…
And yet none of your copy paste word salad proves that Trump is for following the Project 2025 blueprint, not that it even matters. He has not and will not read the 900 page playbook, just like you have not and will not read it. He has said he likes some of it, and some of it he doesn’t like. Of course he’s going to try to maintain good relations with influential conservatives. Trump already had his policy agenda set before Project 2025 came out. This Project 2025 propaganda is nothing more than a silly, fearmongering boogeyman for the typically ignorant Democrat voter. It’s akin to the Democrat lies on abortion, among many other lies.
Of course high level conservative think tanks have interactions with high level conservative politicians. You don’t understand how think tanks work, just like you don’t understand anything. They’re like the intellectual version of lobbyists. They write up policy positions to push on the public and politicians. The Heritage Foundation does a “Project 2025” playbook every single time there’s a change election. The same playbook would exist even if Trump wasn’t running. Furthermore, the main author of the Project even left the Heritage Foundation after the backlash.
“And yet none of your copy paste word salad proves that Trump is for following the Project 2025 blueprint“
Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts says you’re wrong.
“Roberts told the Post in April he had briefed Trump on Project 2025, saying he “personally [has] talked to President Trump about Project 2025 … because my role in the project has been to make sure that all of the candidates who have responded to our offer for a briefing on Project 2025 get one from me.”
And yet, that quote still doesn’t say that Trump is following the Project 2025 blueprint, not that it matters. You don’t even know what it is because you have not and will not read it for yourself. We know what Trump’s plans are because he’s more open about them than any presidential candidate in my lifetime. We know how he’ll govern because we lived through four years of it.
We know how Kamala will govern because she has repeatedly said that she was an integral part of the decision making process in the Biden-Harris Administration. She also said that she wouldn’t have changed anything!
It’s hilarious that you think Trump is pretending to govern one way, when he really has this super secret diabolical plan to rule the world and make you his handmaiden LOL! There’s only one problem with that. You aren’t really thinking. You never think. You only follow your orders because you have proven yourself to be nothing more than a drone. And here you are proving it again.
Yapping Troll obviously needs Soros reichmarks today. More wordsalad (as Kammie).
minor49iq…Before you run around taking up space and thinking you are holier than thou you need to back up and take up space explaining how low you had to go to belong to the Party that owns The Legacy of Slavery, segregation, the kkk, Jim Crow, lynching, Eugenics, Gun Control and other race based atrocities.
BTW…Do you suspect cackle’s Glock has a giggle switch?
TRUMP/VANCE 2024.
Don’t feed the troll
Good advice. Just ignore it and in time IT will go away.
Lol quick accuse the other side of what we are doing. Get fucked propagandist you know what app to use apparently.
You’re the guy who told us that it was perfectly legal for Hillary Clinton to strike out or eliminate the classification markings on classified government documents, make copies and then store them on privately owned servers. Your credibility was gone years ago.
“Hillary Clinton to strike out or eliminate the classification markings on classified government document“
Number one, I’ve never made that claim.
Number two, it’s time for you to back up your claim with fax, what evidence do you have to show that “Hillary Clinton ever strike out or illuminate classification markings on classified government documents”.
Specifically, what documents are you claiming she struck out or eliminated classification markings on?
Sigh. We already have a fascist dictator in office.
But you already knew that, miner49er/roland freisler.
Why don’t you crawl under a rock,pull it over yourself and just expire. Do the world a big favor
“District Attorney Harris forcefully supported Proposition H“
No crime there, in America we have the right to support whatever legislation we feel is appropriate.
I agree, Harris is wrong on that issue, but she’s right on so many more and that’s why the smart people are voting for Harris/Walz.
I hope Trump wins and turns the whole government upside friggin down and shakes out all the nutbags. If thats “proposition 2025” or whatever else you goobers wanna call it, well I’m all for it.
“right on so many more [issues]”
I’d sincerely like to know which issues you think she’s right on. I try to understand the other side. I’ve talked to Democrat voters. This is my understanding. Please let me know if I’ve missed something.
Reasons to vote for Harris:
1. Orange Man Bad (includes protecting democracy)
2. She’s a Democrat
3. Federally mandated unlimited abortion (we already have state-allowed abortion)
4. Free money
5. Govt subsidies for solar/wind/EV and limits on traditional energy (making it more expensive) to combat climate change.
You’re the guy who told us that it was perfectly legal for Hillary Clinton to strike out or eliminate the classification markings on classified government documents, make copies and then store them on privately owned servers. Your credibility was gone years ago.
“Hillary Clinton to strike out or eliminate the classification markings on classified government document“
Number one, I’ve never made that claim.
Number two, it’s time for you to back up your claim with fax, what evidence do you have to show that “Hillary Clinton ever strike out or illuminate classification markings on classified government documents”.
Specifically, what documents are you claiming she struck out or eliminated classification markings on?
You didn’t answer me above. I’ll assume that means I was right. Maybe some other Democrat voter will chime in.
Here’s some info:
“In a convention acceptance speech focused on the economy, Ms Harris promised mortgage assistance for first-time homebuyers, a tax credit for parents of newborns and bans on price gouging at the grocery store to help target inflation.“
“On the campaign trail, the vice-president has reiterated her continued support for the hardline bipartisan border security deal that would have included hundreds of millions of dollars for border wall construction.
It was torpedoed by congressional Republicans earlier this year at Trump’s urging.“
“When Congress passes a law to restore reproductive freedoms, as president of the United States, I will sign it into law,” she said at a rally for her 2024 campaign in Atlanta, Georgia.
She has reiterated that commitment several times, including during the ABC News debate with Donald Trump.“
“As vice-president, she has met 150 world leaders and visited 21 countries.
She attended the Munich Security Conference in the past year, and delivered remarks in support of western security alliance Nato that denounced isolationism and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Ms Harris has vowed to support Ukraine “for as long as it takes”, and represented the US at Kyiv’s “peace conference” in Switzerland.“
“In 2017, while a senator, Ms Harris supported a number of progressive tax programmes, co-sponsoring a bill with Bernie Sanders to expand social security for the elderly by increasing the tax rate on investments.
As a presidential candidate in 2019, she supported a corporate tax rate of 35%, up from 21%.“
“Ms Harris started her legal career prosecuting child abusers and sex traffickers before being elected district attorney of San Francisco, then California’s attorney general.
Her offices increased conviction rates, particularly of violent criminals, though that history led to criticism from the progressive left, which at times labelled her “a cop” – though the right has accused her of being soft on crime.“
Increase home prices and close grocery stores that can’t absorb the increased costs
Doesn’t enforce current laws so empty words
No details on what that would entail so more empty words
Prolong a useless war
Reduce investment and start a new recession
Got real soft once she didn’t need to perform a job with actual measured objectives with oversight.
Great platform
It’s very telling that you aren’t confident enough to describe why you would vote for her in your own words. You’re a drone.
4. Free money: “mortgage assistance” would fall under free money. It would also be disastrous. It’s like you guys didn’t learn anything about how inflation works. Or, it’s more like she doesn’t care about inflation. She only wants more power. That’s the only thing commies understand. They have never cared about the suffering.
The tax credit plan is fine. She followed Trump on that, just like she followed Trump on the no tax on tips. She’s a follower just like you. She has no good original ideas.
Price fixing is idiotic, and is not how you fix inflation. Educate yourself.
The so-called bipartisan border bill is a joke. We’ve been over this. It legalizes what they’re doing at the border. It gets them more money to spend on importing people. All the border czar had to do was reinstate Trump’s policies which they ditched on day one, just like I said they would (and you said they wouldn’t). Then, if they really wanted to fix it, they would implement Trump’s proposed border and immigration policies which the “bipartisan” uniparty DC blob fought him tooth and nail over.
3. Federally mandated unlimited abortion: “When Congress passes a law…”
Ukraine: continue to fund a losing war with no end in sight. That’s her brilliant plan to end the death and destruction? You want more dead Ukrainians? Also, we’re broke.
4. Free money (again): “expand social security for the elderly by increasing the tax rate” and increase other taxes. Multiple tax increases during a time of high inflation and economic uncertainty. Of course there’s the usual envy politics. “We’ll go after those rich people!” Democrat voters are so out of touch, they STILL haven’t noticed that the rich keep getting richer, and the middle class keeps losing pace under both Obama and Biden! Only under Trump did the middle class finally begin getting back to where they were two decades ago, only to have the rug pulled out by the Puppet. Wake up, drone!
“Her offices increased conviction rates, particularly of violent criminals” She encouraged mayhem during the 2020 St. Floyd riots. She literally helped to bail out the criminals! She supported putting law enforcement down in 2020. She supported more lenient sentences for criminals as a senator. It’s hilarious that you guys are pretending like she was a prosecutor, then a presidential candidate. You’re doing that because she was the most left wing senator, even beating Bernie and Liawatha. She was the most disliked VP in modern history! There’s a reason for that.
Her border polices have increased human (including child) trafficking and sexual assault! If you were really against human trafficking, then you would be against Kamala. The bottom line is #1 and #2 from my list. You know it. You just don’t want to admit it.
I don’t see climate change in your list. That’s interesting.
Minor Intellect:
“She (Mattress) attended the Munich Security Conference ….)?
You know who else attended meetings in Munich …. H..I..T..L..E..R !
Kamala, like all Americans, has the right to be a hypocrite and a moron. Hypocrites and morons also have the right to post comments, cooing over their favorite authoritarian politicians, in TFB comment sections.
For now… It could be “illegal malinformation” soon enough. Then the Miner49er bot won’t have to tire itself out posting misinformed drivel here anymore.
“…..that’s why the smart people are voting for Harris/Walz”
These smart people?
“Old, rich, white men are evil and are destroying the country”
“Let’s vote in an old, rich, white man as president of the country”
“Cops are murderers”
“Only cops and military should have guns”
“Women need safe spaces away from men”
“The man is wearing a dress and says he is a woman, so he is allowed in our safe spaces”
“Men are evil and beat women”
“Let’s allow men in women’s sports to beat women”
“DEI is wonderful and great for people of color, especially women of color”
Kamala is a DEI hire
“How dare you say that about a woman of color, you racist!”
“People on the right are violent and hateful”
“If you see people from the right out and about, push back and get in their face and let them know they are not wanted.”
“Guns should be banned because they kill people”
“It is our Right to kill unborn people”
“Believe all women”
This woman says a Democrat sexually assaulted her
“Believe only the women we tell you to believe and trash this woman”
“Women are strong and independent and don’t need men”
“Where have all the real men gone, why are they not helping women?”
“Republicans are trying to take our Rights away”
“Let’s march in the streets to have our Rights taken away!!”
“No citizen needs weapons of war!”
“How are you going to defeat the military with your pea shooter?”
Making the claim “smart people are voting for….” is a passive bullying tactic.
Leftists are the biggest bullies around. They bully by manipulation of self esteem, group belonging and emotions. Think of the stereotypical high school mean girl.
This way they get to play victim as they bully you into complying with their wants.
Recent research demonstrating just that: https://populace.org/research
Most people hold the same normal, reasonable ideas that we as nation have always held. Democrats are the fringe extremists. They bully people into claiming to agree with them and, with frightening success, voting with them.
she’s wrong on a lot of things…most notably her fitness for this office
So far my favorite part about this little circus comes from the NYT. The Style section no less:
If Ms. Harris wanted to appeal to a broad swath of American gun owners, she couldn’t have picked a better brand. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/09/style/kamala-harris-glock-guns.html
It really encapsulates what they all think of us: Huurrrr, durrrr it’s muh brand!!! L3tS wAtCh SuM NASCAR!!
Did Kamaltoe call Willy’s winky a glock? Would that make her a “glock sucker”?!? Inquiring minds wanna know🙄😎Seriously gunz for thee & none for we.
When is it any different for those with authoritarian tendencies with whatever ism they use as their label?
The problem with lying is one always forgets the ones they’re told in the past.
TTAG, can you guys do something about that Miner49er troll? He started the comments off topic with TDS and is continuing it, maybe remove his posts so the rest of us can discuss the article topic or information relevant to TTAG and not have to scroll through his mental illness expression of TDS crap that is neither on topic for the article or TTAG.
He is the definition of a troll. If we said breathing oxygen is a good idea he’d soon be on here telling us what all is wrong with it, and that we just believe breathing is good because Trump told us that was the case.
miner49er is one of our greatest allies. He’s just too stupid to realize it. He’s adding numbers to a pro gun site.
I use his comments to help convince others that the fascist left are a true threat to democracy. He is priceless to our side.
When dacian quit commenting I had a moment of panic. But miner dutifully stepped up and filled the void. He is so self unaware as to be a parody.
If miner is truly a product of our modern education system then he is proof that it needs to be burnt down and started anew.
Which version of Miner seems to be at least 3?
Doesn’t matter. They all make us look good and help the cause.
Hit and run drivers are good for the car body shop business. Still don’t need them on the road.
miner is worth his weight in soros money for our cause. The fact that he can’t understand that makes it just that much better.
“miner49er is one of our greatest allies“
Yes, I am, thank you for noticing🙏
they tend to imbed people like this in what are predominately conservative websites…but try to do the same thing on a predominately liberal website and you’re likely to get bounced…and I speak from experience
Hey, Fidel and Raoul both had nice gun collections. I’d bet Mao did too. So no surprise she has at least one gun, and no surprise she’s bragging about it either – she’s always up in the faces of the rednecks and the straights – although 90% of the time it goes right over their heads. Or under.
Those are commie-salads, not word-salads…
Freedom🇺🇸🥰Xax
I don’t know why you guys are making such a big deal about her claiming to have a GLAWK(TM). GLAWK(TM) continues to make the Gen3s for Cali and for governments that don’t want to upgrade to gen4 or 5 because of parts compatibility, and Gen3s are still sold nationwide.
Prosecutors represent the police, but they are not police officers, so she shouldn’t legally have an LEO-only gun or mags over 10 rounds. If it was a gen4 you’d have a hard time getting anyone to charge her with anything though.
I wonder if Kameltoe possesses her Glock at her new residence at the Naval Observatory in Washington DC?
Does she carry her Glock when she goes to work at the White House?
Does she feel that she needs a gun for self protection just in case the senile, womanizer that she works for sexually assaults her?
Would it not be interesting to see how the order of Presidential succession plays out in such a scenario?
She owns a semiautomatic weapon.
She wants to ban semiautomatic weapons.
She owns a handgun.
She twice tried to ban handguns, first in San Francisco and then in DC.
She owns a 9mm.
Joe Biden said 9mm should be banned because it “blows the lungs out of the body” (his words!)
What, one wonders, might be the source of Biden’s anatomical expertese.
The current Vice President and would be President is, in plain, reasonably polite, entirely accurate English, a double talking hypocrite. The woman is unfit to hold any public office, let alone the presidency.
And yet Alan she will win the presidential nomination.
America has doomed itself.
She has won the nomination. Winning the election might well turn out to be an entirely different thing.
they have to trot someone out there and hope the media will help them perpetuate the ongoing con job…even Obama wasn’t keen on her but then the cash started flowing in and he backed off…still knowing she’s a poor choice
I honestly don’t care what handgun Harris may or may not own. I don’t give a damn if Tampon Tim hunts rabbits or ducks.
What I do care about is the blatant hypocrisy from them wanting to deny the rights of citizens to the same weapons their armed security details have access too. As if they are somehow better or more important than some homeowner or small businessman. You know, the taxpayers who pay their salaries and provide for their security details.
Comments are closed.