To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
I hope to God it’s B. I think it’s B. Can I phone a friend?
If you listen to what all the libtards and their lackies in the media are saying, the answer would be A because all I hear is sporting and hunting, sporting and hunting, sporting and hunting.
It must be all about sporting and hunting.
Yup. A, final answer.
“Oh shit I just jumped into the frying pan! Jump out! Jump out!”
I don’t get it…………….
Oh come on. We know there really isn ‘t a 2A. It was only added in by a secret cabal of Masons in the 1840s in an attempted conspiracy to overthrow the real America the Founding Mothers created which is a socialist vegan commune.
The real Incendiary part would be A being the correct answer….
Didn’t they try this in Japan already?
I think pro-gun legislators should attach an ammendment to every piece of anti-gun legislation that does exactly what he says, makes them step out from behind their protections. If they are going to vote away our means of self defence, they should give up their own.
A is worded wrong, its arm bears not bear arms. Bears like to hunt and fish therfore they must be armed.
Someone needs to tell that to the Syrian Rebels who seem to be slowly taking over a country that has superior fire power. Don’t know what they started with but my guess the rebels kind of borrowed a few tanks and such, probably with some pretty basic weapons at the start.
wow, and apples to orange comparison. That was only 1 murderous man versus a militant police organization and what was the final score – 1 dead murderer to 2 dead officers and 3 seriously wounded officers. Not that I am condoning what he did but that was one mane working alone against an adversary that had many more resources available to them. They could also still go to the store and get food without having to worry about the clerk reporting them. Armed resistance to tyranny, if only 0.5% of the gun owners do it will still be larger than the forces that the tyrants will have. That is because there will be many people who will sympathize and support those resisting (including those in Law Enforcement and the military). Dorner had no such support.
Dorner was just one man. And he tied up thousands of dollars in the hunt for him, as well as countless man-hours in the search for him for the better part of a week. His reign of terror resulted in armed guards being placed in front of the homes of the families of the LAPD. Officers and their families felt sniper’s crosshairs on their backs when they were outside.
Now imagine if there were two guys, or five guys, or ten guys, or more, with an actual plan to start shooting police officers from a distance, maybe while they’re sitting in the cars catching up on their paperwork, and plans to shoot their families, maybe following them around discreetly, to find out where their kids go to school, or where their wives go to work, or just their home addresses, and those groups had numerous escape routes ready to go, all planned out in detail to avoid rush hour traffic, and to avoid the main highways and traffic routes.
Note: I have no plans to do any of the above myself at all. I’m just stating an obvious conclusion that the criminal elements in our society are undoubtedly thinking about after watching this who Dorner fiasco.
Yeah, or exactly the opposite.
And +1 on the “we the people are the government” sentiment. In the stereotypical leftist world view the government is a separate authoritarian entity, and in the stereotypical rightist world view the government is ALSO looked at as a separate authoritarian entity. Both are compelled to look at the government as separate by the desire to abdicate personal responsibility toward a variety of objectives. The stereotypical leftist want’s not to participate in doing things FOR themselves, as is their personal duty and the stereotypical rightist wants not to participate in doing things FOR society, as is their civic duty.
We ALL need to get some skin on the reigns again and be committed to that idea, because through either stereotypical extremist world view we are CREATING that authoritarian entity by separating ourselves from it. What we have now is not “left” and “right”, but “in” and “out” of the governing class, and we’re all “out”.
Both are wrong. The correct reading is:
We know it, not by reading the constitution, but by observing it in practice. Which tells us there must be an article in the constitution that allows certain government officials–facilitated by a cabal of nine henchmen–to insert such words and phrases as they please. It has to be written in secret code, however, and with invisible ink, so that common people reading the whole of the constitution cannot find it.
Something else that Mr.Skelton forgot to mention: LAPD knew exactly who was doing the shooting – they had his photo, his fingerprints (hey, he WORKED for them!), his family members, his friends, his methods and his thoughts on how he would operate – all provided by the killer himself on the internet.
What would it have taken for the LAPD to deal with 10 or 20 people who were doing this anonymously, with no convenient internet manifesto? How long did it take the Feds to catch up with that nutcase Kaczynski, the Unabomber? 18 years? How well would the LAPD do dealing with 25,000 people doing this?
Law enforcement really does depend on the consent and support of the general public. Even as large an organization as the LAPD is heavily outnumbered by just the drug gangs in SoCal – imagine the anarchy if all of those gang members decided to forgo their profit motive and start trying to take over the city. Anyone remember how well the LAPD dealt with the Rodney King riots?
How has this guy managed to live so long being so stupid?
I guess the lesson learned from this:
Do NOT f**k with Magpul…
Damnit Tina, I told you today was GREEN dress day!