Give it to Kamala Harris. The woman told us in her first of two interviews that her values have not changed. Moreover, she has always supported gun bans and gun confiscation that she euphemistically terms “mandatory buybacks.” Last Tuesday night, she chided President Trump for his “continuous lying” about her desire to take people’s guns away. After all, she claimed, she and Timmy are gun owners.
As the “Fact Check” above – a real fact check, not the so-called “fact check” that the legacy media uses to describe their gaslighting and censorship – Harris has since flip-flopped again on taking guns out of the hands of law-abiding Americans.
A whole three and a half days after the debate – after she told President Trump to “quit lying” about her desire to take away guns from the little people, she posted this on her X account.
That’s some pretty quick flip-flopping on guns.
Here’s the bottom line: For most folks who support Kamala Harris, it doesn’t matter that she is a mindless Marxist.
For those leaning left who value their right to defend themselves and their right to keep and bear arms, they should vote in their own self-interest.
Because the only thing that stops bad people with evil in their hearts is a good guy or gal with a gun.
There’s a new medical diagnosis for neck injury, its called KamaLash. But unlike whiplash, you get KamaLash by watching Kamala flip flop so much.
1982 Blade Runner when Deckard caps android Pris,,, epic flip flopping.
Like all of the pol_litic_al classes, Kameltoe does more backflips than circus acrobats.
All mine identified as muskets, and are not for sale.
I gots Kamala where she be today!
Is she lying when she flips or when she flops?
Both I think,
Correct, just different sides of her mouth.
Californian/Canadian leftist speaks with forked tongue.
1994-2004 “Assault Weapons Ban” did not take away anyone’s guns. She’s been consistent since dropping out in 2019 and realized that calling for confiscation was not a winning issue. No doubt she’d love to try if she thought she could get the support, but her new post on Twitter doesn’t change her official position at all.
It damn sure “took away” Americans ability to obtain/keep particular firearms which they wanted to own.
Well, despite all the radical claims, it really didn’t. When you bought your AR-15 during those years, it was called something else, did not have a flash suppressor and the bayonet lug was literally ground off of the front sight, but the gun itself was unchanged. Of course, it was ILLEGAL to replace the front sight with one which did not have the bayonet lug ground off, for that you must go to prison for many years, but that’s only common sense!! I mean, look at all the murders committed with fixed bayonets in just the previous 150 years!
Didn’t the 1994 AWB expire because it wasn’t voted again in 2004?
You can’t “renew” something that expired and was expunged.
Personally, I totally SUPPORT renewing the 1994 AWB — as long as it is a “word for word” renewal, with no changes. During that 10 year period the BATFE and NSSF data show that MORE AR-15 type rifles were sold than in the entire 30 year period preceeding it (Colt’s first advertisements for the “AR-15 Sporter” were in 1964). In fact, the AR-15 gained its popularity as a “modular weapons platform” during the ban as more and more manufacturers brought out variations and versions of what we now call the MSR. It’s just that Aunt Kammie and Uncle Joe and their cronies never looked at the actual data before they started crying about “banning” things.
Also motivated GLOCK to come out with its sub-compact models, and probably boosted .45 ACP sales with the asinine restriction on new “large capacity” magazine sales.
Well yeah, why would they ever look at data? The only problems they’re trying to solve is getting more money and power.
cackles is a pos…I concur Judge Joe Brown.
TRUMP/VANCE 2024.
So Commiefornia is way worse than ILLannoy?!? I can freely buy ammo at Indiana Cabela’s despite the “background check”. All they want to see is a FOID. Anyone running a check doesn’t get my business(&I tell everyone here & online). I’m ok with boo-lits but hey what’s a few hundred more???
Why is This Massachusetts Man in Jail for Defending Himself?
ht–tps:- //ww- w.youtube.com/watch?v=FlO89ap7o9I
Trump Assassin Is Felon Barred From Gun Possession, Yet Shannon Watts Blames Red Flag Laws.
htt – ps: – //ww – w.youtube.com/watch?v=JCM1rWzOry4
new details emerge, Trump would be assassin not from area and got SKS rifle from area, investigating sheriff posits details pointing to possible conspiracy.
htt – ps: – //ww – w.youtube.com/watch?v=G5I98sVGq5g
So how would banning anything in any way disarm the actual violent criminals or prevent someone with evil intent from arming themselves?
How are restrictions/bans etc. Constitutional? Is not a ban on anything an infringement on someone’s ability to purchase or possess it? Are not the current restrictions and proposed bans an infringement on the people’s right to keep and bear arms?
And yes, if someone can afford it they should be able to own anything they choose to own. If you can afford a couple million for a nuke, you should be able to keep it. Or more realistically some sort of full auto rifle etc. If someone can afford to purchase and feed an M-2 Browning, be my guest. Use the weapon to commit a violent crime and forfeit your life. Deal with the human part of the issue and the hardware becomes a non issue.
This will be very much like the minimum wage argument it started off at $15 an hour then went to $20 an hour and there was a democrat just recently calling for $75 an hour. “Ban Assault Weapons” Will simply be shortened to weapons.
I’m learning so much since the second attempt… there’s a thing now know as The SKS platform, a Soviet Assault Weapon System shooting the same High Powered Cartridge as the AK47.
Wow, the value of the two that I have in my “conglomeration” must have at least tripled.
Yes indeed, the SKS – with it’s sleek, one piece gripless wooden stock, fixed ten-round magazine that loaded via stripper clips (bonus points for a gun that actually DOES use “clips”) which prevented utilizing a conventional scope system, sights marked for distances out to 800 meters, and a folding “toad-sticker” bayonet that could double as a makeshift monopod.
The SKS Weapon System (TradeMark – MSM 2024) was recognized as being so fearful that the Russians voluntarily withdrew it from service within a few short years, fearing that if enough of it’s soldiers fired shots simultaneously in the same direction that it could alter the Earth’s rotation. It was replaced by the AK47* that fired the same-dimensioned cartridge, but reduced to only 20 percent of the SKS’s ferocious power.
*see also ” The AK47 – the rifle that caused the collapse of The USSR “
Convert them to use removable mags and the value automatically goes up another notch. Well, by the cost of the mag at least…
Gun banners have always lied about their true intentions and historically said they aren’t coming for YOUR guns -just a few common sense gun “safety” laws. The endzone is and always has been total civilian disarmament. Every tiny common sense law is just a ploy to move the chains downfield because unlike football they get unlimited downs and never need to give up the ball. The next play will allow them a few more inches towards their goal and so on.
Comments are closed.