Home » Blogs » New From Maxpedition: Entity Line of Tactical Packs Without the Tactical Look

New From Maxpedition: Entity Line of Tactical Packs Without the Tactical Look

Jeremy S. - comments No comments

Maxpedition makes packs, bags, cases, organizers, holsters, knives, and much more for the concealed carry, travel, and tactical markets. If you’ve been seeking that tactical CCW functionality without the tactical aesthetic, though, you’ve noticed your options are all too limited. Enter Maxpedition’s ENTITY Series, designed around their NTT concept. What’s that? Find out in the press release and video below . . .

Introducing the 2018 Maxpedition ENTITY™ Series

Maxpedition is proud to introduce the new ENTITY™ Series! Designed around out Non-Tactical/Tactical (NTT) concept, the new Entity line focuses on discreet concealed carry for covert operators and prepared citizens who choose to be unnoticed. A sleek, modern exterior devoid of characteristics typically associated with the “tactical look” masks an interior optimized for organization and situational readiness.

Photo of author

Jeremy S.

Jeremy is TTAG's Deputy Editor, working mostly behind the scenes but, when he attempts to write, he focuses on comprehensive gun & gear reviews. Jeremy strives to collect objective data whenever possible, and looks to write accurate reviews that reflect the true user experience. He lives outside of Austin, TX.

0 thoughts on “New From Maxpedition: Entity Line of Tactical Packs Without the Tactical Look”

  1. After all that panty-twisting on the Bond Bullpup, I’ll be waiting for the “I can buy 20 Hi-points for that kinda money” lines. But as a 1911 guy, I LOVE it.

    Reply
  2. Shadow 2 Kadet Kit, really? Typical Shadow owner is going to run the lightest hammer spring they can and still have 9 mm go off. Swapping the hamming spring so you can shoot 22 is kind of a PITA. But what do I know.. Wait…
    “When used in competition-oriented or modified 75 series pistols like the Shadow, a factory-weight 75 mainspring may be required to provide proper primer ignition.”

    Reply
  3. So. Just to recap.

    An all-American 1911, that notes the year “1776” with a quote from 1787.

    Made in Taiwan. By a company rooted in a Swiss-German manufacturer.

    Talk about your melting pot…

    Reply
    • “Talk about your melting pot…”

      Since they proudly proclaim it has a similar weight to the real one, it’s probably made of some cheap zinc alloy pot metal…

      Reply
  4. Hunting, ethics, guns, pets, etc. all aside, here’s what I don’t get:

    “legal trophy hunting can help enable illegal poaching by creating a market for trophies”

    No, a trophy is an object that symbolizes an accomplishment. You pay the price for the experience and successfully complete a difficult hunt. Therefore, you potentially take an animal part as a “trophy”. You can buy one and lie about a hunt, but the significance is gone. You can buy gold and make a gold medal and pretend you won it, but what’s the point?

    I realize there’s probably a black market for tusks, hides, and other common trophy items, but their value on such a market is due to the price and difficulty of getting them. To buyers, they’d be collectibles that show the owner has connections or is daring and willing to risk legal problems.

    Spending a few thousand on a hunt resulting in a legal trophy seems completely different from buying banned animal parts.

    Reply

Leave a Comment