Okay has been making Ok magazines for awhile. They’re widely used by the military, law enforcement and other civilian shooters. Okay’s set to release an upgraded version of their already quality aluminum magazine . . .
The new Surefeed E2 magazine features textured side panels for added grip, new low friction lips that improve alignment and dramatically reduce the effort needed to feed rounds, and a self lubricating follower.
For slightly less information head over to Surefeed’s website here. We’ll be testing these magazines to make sure they’re OK. OK?
It’s time to end the NFA already… still.
A bump stock is a mechanical device that converts expended gases of the bullet into mechanical energy moving the rifle in a way that increases the rate of fire.
A trigger selector (safe semi auto) on a military rifle is a mechanical device lifting a sear thus removing the limitation of mechanical movement used to control a rifle bolt. It is used to increase the rate of fire.
Bump stocks are not a cosmetic attachment but a device that increases the rate of fire.
We of the gun community must reconcile the above facts and lend support to classify bump stocks as a device used to increase the rate of fire similiar to a machine gun.
It’s up to ATF to determine if they should remain legal or be registered.
I really want a Ruger PC 10mm carbine.
Okay Industries had the chance in the 90’s to shape their fortune. They were “the standard” when Magpul was just making the Magpul pull tabs for USGI magazines. They are a couple days late and several million dollars short by now.
10mm for me, finding a do it all gun led me to a delta elite over a 44 mag. the reload time and follow up shot time are a huge factor to me. with the penetrator rounds going through bullet proof glass like butter theres no worry using it as a bear gun. hollow points for urban carry.
So if this happens, will it be an outright ban as in not-legal-to-own? Or will it be a ban in new sales?
I think it will be a ban in new sales. The government will not want to make a bunch of law-abiding citizens into criminals just because they already own a bump stock. They’ll just ban future sales of new bump stocks. So I guess maybe I should buy one. They’re still out there, even new ones:
http://www.armslist.com/posts/8003461/dallas-texas-gun-parts-for-sale–slide-fire-ssar-15-sbs-bump-stock
If you want gun control it’s as easy as moving to Australia or England. Where you don’t have the bill of rights to protect ya.
Don’t let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya!
Democratic party: Using humans as tools since the 1800s.
This is a record for sympathy evaporation…a progtards’e wet dream.
Way late, but still worth posting. OKAY E2 mags are absolutely marvelous.
Some of the commenters would have enjoyed my…..Pmag give away. I stopped buying anything Magpul. When they first came out it was a good product. Now just about every firearm sold has Magpul furniture, or magazines. The stocks rattle, like the older 49 dollar plastic “M4” stocks that used to come on AR’s before Magpul came into the business. The stocks don’t always lock in place. Their quality is not what it used to be. I’ve taken off all Magpul furniture, and gave away all my Pmags. 50 mags to be exact. I have various AR platforms, in 556, and 300 BLK, and like to have plenty of mags for each. The only Pmags I kept are the John Noveske flaming pig Magpuls I bought for support of the children, and to match my Noveske rifles. Otherwise, I have gone all OKAY magazines. Some Stainless Steel E Landers for my La Rue 6.5 Grendel as well. I’ve been shooting for 35 years. Not once have I had an issue with an aluminum magazine. I’ve had a couple Pmags crack, fully loaded, along with some of the earlier polymer magazines, before the Pmag fad. The comment of the covers are needed to prevent the cracking issue…..well you don’t need covers for aluminum mags. And now, if you want that added security for a Pmag, you have to purchase the covers separately.. More money for Magpul, since you have to pay extra for a cracking issue Magpul should have resolved by now. Instead they charge the consumer extra for a defect, and the consumer has accepted that non sense. Would most consumers buy a car knowing the steering wheel will break off the shaft at any moment, and expect to pay extra to prevent that defect?