Kuachua Brillion Xiong White House Attack Biden Assassination
Courtesy whitehouse.gov

The NSSF is calling on President-elect Donald Trump to dismantle the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention, established under President Joe Biden. The NSSF argues the office, funded by taxpayers, focuses on limiting Second Amendment rights rather than addressing criminal misuse of firearms.

The organization claims the Biden administration’s office, supervised by Vice President Kamala Harris, diverted resources to gun control agendas rather than public safety. It accuses the office of employing former gun control advocates, including Stefanie Feldman, director, and Rob Wilcox, former lobbyist for Everytown for Gun Safety—a group that advocates for banning classes of firearms and imposing restrictions on the firearm industry. Additionally, Greg Jackson, special assistant to the president and deputy director, previously worked for the Tides Foundation Community Justice Action Fund, another gun control advocacy group.

NSSF Senior Vice President & General Counsel Lawrence G. Keane said President-elect Trump has a chance to “stand strong with law-abiding Second Amendment supporters and wipe away this unprecedented abuse of government authority.” According to Keane, the office was designed to cater to special-interest gun control supporters and used taxpayer funds to, in his view, erode the rights protected under the U.S. Constitution.

Feldman, who previously stated on social media that President Biden would work to repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), reportedly aims to dismantle liability protections for firearm manufacturers. The NSSF has further criticized the office for its alleged involvement in lawsuits aimed at Glock to pressure design changes for handguns, which the office reportedly pursued with Everytown and the City of Chicago.

The NSSF points to an ongoing investigation by the U.S. House Oversight Committee regarding alleged collusion with gun control groups and the office’s reluctance to address criminal gun misuse, noting the office has yet to comply with subpoenas from Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.).

Trump may consider repurposing the office to support Second Amendment protections, which would be a bitter irony to anti-gunners who believed the creation of the office was a doorway for them to overrun America’s constitutional rights.

35 COMMENTS

  1. Perhaps we could just deport them? North Korea has a very low level of gun violence, so they should be comfy there. Or, if they are ambitious career-wise, there’s always Haiti.

  2. Nah, keep it open, and staff it with people from Voters Demand Action on Jailing The Responsible Perps …
    how perfectly Non-PC.

  3. The White House Office Of Constitutional Rights Abolishment…. it’s un-elected bureaucrats given official power to dictate abolishment of a constitutional right through making government policy, operating in secret and not accountable to the American public and shielded from oversight, unconstitutionally funded with tax payer dollars, being paid by anti-gun sources to push their agenda while collecting tax payer dollar paychecks at least twice that of the average middle income family, staff composed of self-declared practicing marx -ist social -list, given a deceptive title of White House Office Of Gun Violence Prevention, headed by a marx -ist social -ist named Kamala Harris…

    Yeah, it needs to go.

  4. Don’t disband it! Transform it! Use it as a means to DEFEND and RESTORE Second Amendment Rights! Staff it from gun rights organizations.

    The lefties will just go NUTS!

    • Exactly. And – impound the slush fund created from both Federal appropriations and healthy “donations” placed into it by Soros, Bloomberg, et al and use it for actual “Gun Violence Prevention” as suggested by others above to actually prosecute the ones responsible for the violence.
      (no need to worry about them as a voting factor, after all)

    • My fear is that if they don’t disband it but merely change its purpose, then four years from now the Dems will just repurpose it again as a gun-control agency. If he doesn’t disband it, then every four years it will flip back and forth to and from a gun control agency, wasting taxpayer dollars to infringe on our rights.

      It’s much better to disband the agency, put a stake through its heart, bury it in consecrated ground, and soak the burial site with holy water so it can’t come back from the dead!

  5. Trump should close it and reopen it as the office of How did the 15 million extra votes biden received in 2020 disappear and not carry over to harris/walz in 2024?

  6. As funny as it would be to repurpose it I’d rather it just go away. If it doesn’t exist it can’t cost anything.

    Cut, cut, cut, cut. Slash the growth, burn the stumps and salt the earth.

    Send in the DOGE team and make it an episode of hoarders so we can watch the bureaucrats cry as Vivek tosses their shit into an industrial shredder. Maybe they’ll lose limbs as they reach in to rescue their bullshit.

  7. Wonder what President Trump thinks of FEMA now?
    Bidens gun crime prevention just set up a bunch of his cronies payed for by taxpayers.
    He should have been impeached for that, among other things.
    Well anyway we won’t have to watch him grope young girls on national television anymore.
    Democrats are digging their own graves.

    • The Inflation Reduction Act was a complete joke from beginning to end. Democrats are insane.

      Washington, D.C.–The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released its analysis of a newly announced Biden-Harris program intended to paper over the flaws of the so-called Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Based on CBO estimates, this election-year stunt to artificially lower the cost of seniors’ Part D premiums will cost taxpayers at least $7 billion in 2025, including $2 billion in additional interest on our already ballooning debt. CBO also notes the underlying partisan policy changes to seniors’ prescription drug coverage could cost up to $20 billion more in 2025 than previously assumed.

      • “underlying partisan policy changes to seniors’ prescription drug coverage“

        “to artificially lower the cost of seniors’ Part D premiums“

        Yep, the Republicans will unwind all the efforts to lower the cost of seniors part D premiums and increase seniors prescription drug coverage.

        I’m sure that will be very popular with America’s old folks.

        Those seniors will do just fine without having expanded drug coverage or lower premiums.

        “the ex-president suggested he was open to cutting Social Security and Medicare, telling CNBC, “There is a lot you can do in terms of entitlements, in terms of cutting and in terms of also the theft and the bad management of entitlements.”

        I just can’t wait, this will be so fascinating as the next 12 months unfold.

        • How much damage was biden and then harris doing to seniors with the inflation, and all the everyday costs going up?

          Every comment you make here is proof that you haven’t a clue that you enabled Trumps return.

          Keep it up. You’re helping get his agenda through now.

          • “How much damage was biden and then harris doing”

            As I noted above, we’ll be paying the price for some time now. It ain’t over. Remember all the fires Trump had to put out after eight years of Obama? Go back and watch the 2016 debates. It’s crazy how quickly he took care of those issues. The main issue for the next three years became the (Democrat-seeded) Russian hoax.

        • You completely overlooked the point which is similar to what they did with the petroleum reserves. They borrowed from the future to cover up their mismanagement of the present. The bill always comes due, but they’ve proven they don’t care about that.

          Remember when they said there wouldn’t be any inflation? Then they said okay you got me, but it will be…um…transitory. Yeahhh…that’s the ticket! They lied about that so they could pass their completely unnecessary, exorbitant spending bills to pay their cronies. Now the drooling puppet in the White House is bragging about his “historic” spending bills. That’s why they’re on their way out.

          “I just can’t wait, this will be so fascinating as the next 12 months unfold.”

          I know. It’s just like last time. I’ve already heard plenty of you guys hoping for an economic downturn (which looks likely – things are bad) or some kind of crisis. You guys were downright giddy during the pandemic and Summer of Mostly Peaceful Fire. You hate America, but you love political power. That’s the name of the game.

  8. Fire everyone currently employed in it. Do a complete revamp of it’s purpose by hiring only pro 2nd Amendment employees and use it to get National Reciprocity and the Hearing Protection Act passed.

  9. Seems like the general ‘tone’ of the comments is to abolish it. I agree, but that should also apply to ALL of the other useless bureaucracies we are stuck with. Any ‘agency’ that is NOT achieving their chartered goals needs to go away. A couple of quick examples – dept. of energy around since ’73 and has not reduced energy costs nor made us energy independent. dept. of education – has ‘succeeded’ in drastically reducing high school graduation rates, taken the US from one of the best educated countries in the world to near the bottom, all while indoctrinating students in the latest marxist ideology and dei.

    • “dept. of energy around since ’73 and has not reduced energy costs nor made us energy independent“

      It seems you don’t know much about the DOE’s mission.

      Perhaps you’re right, America’s nuclear power plants are doing just fine and certainly don’t need the DOE oversight that Congress passed.

      What could go wrong by abolishing oversight of the multinational corporations that own the nuclear power plants?

      After all, the record of safety is exemplary, just consider 3 mile island or Fukushima, both designed by multinational corporations based in the United States:

      “The reactors for Units 1, 2, and 6 were supplied by General Electric, those for Units 3 and 5 by Toshiba, and Unit 4 by Hitachi. All six reactors were designed by General Electric. Architectural design for General Electric’s units was done by Ebasco.“

        • Miner, they fall primarily under of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Your “brag” just further points out why we need to close The Department of Redundancy Department.

      • “Energy Department Quadruples Lending Budget in Rush To Approve ‘Green Energy’ Loans Before Trump Takes Office ”

        h ttps://freebeacon.com/energy/energy-department-quadruples-lending-budget-in-rush-to-approve-green-energy-loans-before-trump-takes-office/

        Jigar Shah, giving tax payer dollars loans to his ‘buddy’ companies through Cleantech Leaders Roundtable which was founded by Shah and acts as the gatekeeper for such loans to companies with shady and illegal practices that Shah is invested in and makes a profit from.

        Yeah, I tend to think that you, Miner49er, don’t know much about the Biden-Harris DOE’s mission.

        • The Puppet Admin’s mission from the beginning was to raid the treasury. Do people understand how difficult it can be to land a government contract? You had to have an established business with a track record. If it’s a huge contract, you would often be audited before being awarded the contract. Notice the brand new companies with no track record raking in hundreds of millions in “green energy” money. Then notice their connections to Democrat politicians. Nothing to see. Move along. Look over there! Climate crisis! You’re a denier!! Heretic!!

  10. “The White House Office of Armed Citizens’ Preparedness just announced the opening of vast tracts of federal land for the purpose of providing space for citizens to safely gather and practice tactical operations. This office will coordinate with other departments as necessary to ensure overlap with other potential live-fire activities is alleviated. Government oversight is forbidden.”

  11. Do scientific research on the various causes of violence and the research on possible strategies to change the psyche of those who are violent and also prevention strategies to use in schools etc.
    Then publish the results.
    This would focus not on the gun but the people misusing them.
    This would go a long way to bring the misled from the ant-gunners. And it would bring more evidence against their cause.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here