In these days of dashcams and cell cams, more and more gun violence is caught on tape. Yet the mainstream media censors the resulting material to “spare” viewers ghastly images of gun gore. Why? Why shouldn’t these gatekeepers provide an unfiltered look at what happens when lead meets flesh? Evidence suggests the taboo will soon be toast. “A judge has ruled that the media will be given access to the videotape of an 8-year-old boy who accidentally shot himself in the head at a gun show,” wggb.com reports. “Judge Peter Velis said Monday there is no legal reason to prohibit media access to the video. Prosecutors and defense attorneys objected.” [Emphasis added.] They won’t, but should the someone in the MSM show Christopher Bizilj’s horrific death? TTAG will (if we can), but should we?
![By Larry Keane President Joe Biden traveled to New York City for a media event to try and show America he’s doing something about rampant crime. Instead, he blamed the Second Amendment and lawful gun owners, said nothing about holding criminals to account and repeated the same tired lies about the firearm industry he keeps at the ready – lies “fact-checked” as being false each time he’s previously recited them. It makes no difference to the president. He’s not even trying anymore. To President Biden and national gun control groups the problem is always the gun and the law-abiding members of the industry. It’s never the criminal. Blaming the ‘Resistance’ President Biden was joined by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and Democratic New York City Mayor Eric Adams for a “Gun Violence Strategies Partnership” meeting to talk about how to solve the crime surge, particularly those involving firearms. Instead of real solutions, the focus devolved into blaming law-abiding gun owners and again pushing a gun control agenda. “Enough is enough,” President Biden said. “Because we know we can do things about this, but for the resistance, we’re getting from some sectors of the government and the Congress and the state legislatures, and the organizational structures out there.” That “resistance” the president spoke of is the American people. Over the past two years they’ve become fed up with police defunding policies and soft-on-crime prosecutors, like Manhattan’s Democratic District Attorney Alvin Bragg. They’ve invested in their own safety. The “resistance” is the 21 million lawful gun buyers in 2020, including more than 8.4 million first-time buyers, and the 18.5 million gun buyers in 2021, with more than 5.4 million first-timers. The ”resistance” has backstopped Congress from passing federal gun control that don’t address crime. It also stopped President Biden’s nominations of paid gun control lobbyist David Chipman to lead the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and banking activist Saule Omarova as Comptroller of the Currency because not even all U.S. Senate Democrats could support them. They would have turned those agencies into bludgeons to hammer the firearm industry to achieve a special interest, gun control agenda. Favorite Falsehoods The president turned his aim from lawful gun owners towards the firearm industry and repeated a lie he’s rehearsed several times before. “Imagine had we had a liabil… [sic] they’re the only industry in America that is exempted from being able to be sued by the public. Only one,” the president protested. “Why the gun manufacturers?… It’s got to end. They’ve got to be held responsible for the things they do that are irresponsible.” He repeated the claim for emphasis. “And I find that outrageous.” This is flatly false. The president knows by now, or his speechwriters do and they don’t bother with the facts. CNN, Politicfact and Washington Post have all checked President Biden on his remark, including after he said it in the White House Rose Garden. CNN cleanly rebuked it. “This is false. Gun manufacturers are not entirely exempt from being sued, nor are they only industry with some liability protections.” Politifact rated it “false.” Washington Post wasn’t kinder, saying, “Biden is wrong to claim the gun industry is totally immune.” The firearm industry has liability protections under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), bipartisan legislation enacted under former President George W. Bush. The firearm industry cannot be held liable when unaffiliated third-parties, in this case criminals, misuse a legal, lawfully sold product. It’s fundamental tort law and is similar to an individual attempting to hold Ford and Budweiser responsible for drunk driving deaths. The law was passed in direct response to lawsuits filed against the industry by control groups and municipalities like the city of New York and the state of New York. These type of lawsuit continue to be filed, now even by foreign governments represented by the same gun control group, the Brady Center. Colonial-Era Error President Biden continued to ignore facts on the Second Amendment and its history. He even erred when speaking about the Revolution-era days and why the right to keep and bear arms was so sacrosanct. “When the amendment was passed, it didn’t say anybody could own a gun and any kind of gun and any kind of weapon,” President Biden remarked. “You couldn’t buy a cannon, and when – the – when this, uh, this amendment was passed.” It did, and does, say the right of the People “shall not be infringed.” Even The Washington Post was brutal in their assignment of “Four Pinocchio’s” to this statement. “Biden has already been fact-checked on this claim — and it’s been deemed false. We have no idea where he conjured up this notion about a ban on cannon ownership in the early days of the Republic, but he needs to stop making this claim.” In fact, the Constitution of early America – before the Bill of Rights, and Second Amendment, was even ratified – granted and encouraged “special waivers” to American merchants and sailors, “allowing private individuals to act as pirates on behalf of the United States against countries engaged in war with it.” Americans given waivers and who owned warships obviously also obtained cannons for use in battle. In fact, it is still perfectly legal to buy a cannon today. It is the presidents’ fundamental misunderstanding and blatant lying about the Second Amendment that informs his gun control agenda and misguided approach to solving the crime problem. Millions of law-abiding Americans took ownership of their Second Amendment rights to protect themselves, understanding the president won’t. Instead of mangling the meaning of the right and pushing for more gun control on law-abiding Americans, the president should keep it simple. Take on the criminals and punish them for breaking the law.](https://cdn0.thetruthaboutguns.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/download-26-218x150.jpeg "Mainstream Media Lies to Cover for Kamala")
Gruesome footage of people leaping to their death from the burning world trade center was censored by media because it might inflame hostilities against terrorists.
Gruesome footage of people dying from accidental gunshots will be shown because it might incite people to ban guns.
That’s our media – no better than snakes.
For the love of God, Robert, don’t fall into their trap and don’t show that footage. It serves no purpose. You should have higher standards.
I read recently the case of a girl who took her dad’s Porche (without permission) and went for a 100 MPH drive. She lost control and hit a toll booth. The EMS guys took pictures of the scene (as they are supposed to). Two supervisors emailed the pictures of her mangled corpse to friends (as they are NOT supposed to) and the pictures ended up on the Internet. Her family saw them. And sued. The case was thrown out of court by some idiot judge, then reinstated on appeal.
I’d make a couple of points, playing Devil’s Advocate for both sides:
If we are focused on “scooping” the competition, titillating for the sake of ratings, or showing them just to get a reaction, I’d say…NO. But, if there’s a valid reason to show them – i.e.: analysis of a crime scene, proving that it was a righteous shoot, or something like that, I’d say…perhaps. This would assume that the pictures have been released, through the proper channels, to the public, and that the family of the victim is okay with it. (If it’s a dead perp, I have a lot less sympathy for the family.)
Overall, I’d say my default position would be ‘there’s no reason to show them’ unless we find a compelling reason that people need to see them.
Take the high road.
Its not about the eight year old, its about you.
I believe that you should show this video, (I won’t be able to watch) because hopefully it can teach anyone who does watch a very important lesson about firearms safety and responsbility. P.S. The reason why I won’t be able to watch the video is that I most certainly would have nightmares seeing what happened to that poor boy.
Comments are closed.