CCRKBA: More Guns Equals Less Crime

As the data for 2023 continues to roll in, the evidence is mounting to support the claims of gun rights activists that guns do indeed save lives. This recent article from the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) lays out the argument from the most recent data: Data posted at … Read more

FACT CHECK: No, Shootings Don’t Increase When More People Carry Firearms

By Jon Miltimore A couple of months ago, The Atlantic published an article written by staff writer David A. Graham that explores the surge of violence the United States experienced in 2020. Overall the article, which analyzes findings from the FBI’s “Uniform Crime Report,” is quite good. It effectively breaks down what we know and—more … Read more

DC Pol: “Nobody thinks we would have fewer shootings and fewer homicides if we had more relaxed gun laws”

Paging John Lott. John Lott. Will gun stat cruncher John Lott please report to The Truth About Guns to provide an exclusive quote to fact-slap non-voting D.C. rep Eleanor Holmes Norton. Apparently, Ms. Norton hasn’t heard of Mr. Lott or his death-by-numbers magnum opus More Guns, Less Crime. Otherwise, she would know that when the firearms-oriented academician sings “Take that back, Or I will attack. And you don’t want that,” he’s got the power. Anyway, The Wall Street Journal quote highlights the fact that bureaucrats are still dedicated to making it as difficult as possible to buy a weapon legally in the District of Colombia—despite the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court’s Heller decision struck down Washington’s handgun ban. And this is news? The only real surprise here: the Journal trots out a .22 rifle buyer to prove their point. Oh wait, lawsuit launching biathlete Mark Snyder is the new poster boy for unfettered access to firearms in the nation’s capital. Well, one of the poster boys for the NRA legal action. The one the Journal chose because . . . he’s non-threatening. Anyway, here are those hurdles that need jumping:

Read more

Arizona Daily Sun: Open Carry Means “Arming a bunch of amateur civilians in place of passing gun laws”


The internets are abuzz re: this morning’s Frank Rich editorial: Axis of the Obsessed and Deranged. The New York Times’ liberal extremist builds on a previous Sunday magazine piece painting the Tea Party movement as a bunch of loons. Rich launches a dietribe [sic] linking the populist protest with terrorists and, well, deranged people. The only thing missing from Mr. Rich’s viscous and unfounded smearicle: a link to the movement’s belief in Second Amendment rights. Maybe that’s because his boss, publisher Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., has a concealed carry permit. Or maybe Mr. Rich knows there is a pale beyond which he shouldn’t go. Nah. It’s coming. Meanwhile, the Arizona Sun’s editorial board has got its proverbial knickers in a twist re: the state’s move towards “Open Carry” gun laws (whereby legal citizens can carry firearms without a special licensing procedure). Here’s the headline again, complete with self-righteous rhetorical flourish: “Arming a bunch of amateur civilians in place of passing gun laws with teeth sends up the white flag of surrender in the battle for a civil society governed by laws, not force.” That’s how it ends, of course. Here’s how it starts . . .

Read more