Hi, I’m a journalist with the New York Times. I’m just calling to wonder…I have two questions. How do you sleep at night? And aren’t you just like a little bit worried that there might be a hell and when you meet God he will send you there?
That’s just my only question.
Third question. The only people politicizing this seems to be you because you’re the only people I got a f@cking press release from.
Again, I am from the New York Times and I’m letting everyone in the New York Times know what kind of f@cking a$$holes you are. Congrats on being a laughing stock.
You f@cking ghouls. I hope that there is a God in heaven so he judges you when you die.
— The New York Times’ Erin Marquis in a message left for Great Lakes Gun Rights after issuing this press release
If there was a reboot of Married with Children today, Al Bundy would be a journalist.
What’s interesting is that she is NOT a “reporter with the New York Times.” She’s with a product-review site (Wirecutter) that is owned by the Times.
NYT has announced that they are “reviewing” the matter. I suspect we’ll see the NYT say, essentially, “she’s not one of us.”
How dare you insult Al Bundy in such a way. Chris Cuomo, Lemon, Steltzer, Maddow are “journalist” Bundy would never stoop that low.
A wise man, Jaimee Larrea, once told me a person cusses when they don’t have an intelligent way to speak their mind. I believe that applies with Erin. I believe the correct Southern expression for her would be, “God bless her dear heart”.
Gun Control always has and always will bring out the racist and nazi in people infected by such rot. The rant from a deranged NY Slimes journalist is just another example of that rot. On second thought I recall the NY Slimes actually gave Hitler some supporting press…Fact check that fraulein erin marquis…Sieg Heil NY Gun Control Slimeball.
Libs can’t count.
Came here to say this 😂😂
So, Nathan,
Show me where he is wrong. Leftists can’t count, can’t learn economics, . . . heck, they can’t even tell you how many genders there are.
Question: How many Democrats does it take to solve a problem?
Answer: No one knows; it hasn’t happened yet.
I think that “t” in “can’t” and the “o” in “count” was excessive. But that’s just me.
So you think Conservatives can count? Guess what everyone can count. Until they run headlong into some political issue where their side suffers from inconvenient math. At that point, Conservative or Liberal, the ability to use math HONESTLY goes right down the crapper.
I’m sure the Lincoln Project had no problem counting the money you sent them.
Watch your doors and corners I know that Conservative can count a heck of a lot better than any Leftist-Socialist can. Heck, Sleepy Jo and his minions on the Left are trying to tell us that his “budget” is balanced.
i guess you consider yourself one of those “independents” (meaning you are not really sure of what you are)
Aaaaand here comes the Bothsides guy.
A) cute she thinks anyone gives a shit about the NY Times
B) I didn’t like her when she wrote for jalopnik either.
C) don’t know what exactly triggered her, but if if she was the victim of expert 10lvl trolling, that level of irrationality, and lack of emotional control scares the hell out of me.
Could you imagine dropping angry F-bombs and personal attacks like that while working in a ‘professional’ capacity while throwing your employers name around like they were the big dog on the block? In a recording none-the-less?
My butt woulda been on the street in hours…
It’s the NYT. They proudly stand by and employ open racists, as long as they’re racist in one direction.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this the same rag that covered for Stalin during the Holodomor?
And loved the American Maxtist (and American Nazi) party during the 1930s.
NY Times is a dispicable rag that no self-respecting bird would squat on.
Not just in the 1930s. Google “The Red Century” and “New York Times.” This was a series of articles celebrating Communism in all its manifestations. Turns out the sex was better in Communist states, and Lenin was a naturalist/environmentalist, among other things!
The same NYT that deployed Gatling guns during the Draft Riots?
“Kind socialist efficiency is creating a lean Ukrainian citizen”. Obesity is removed from the Land by Great Leader’s guiding hand”
seems dangerous like they should have common sense limits placed on them.
In normal times I’d assume that’s a troll making fun of journalists and the NYT. Sadly, now that we live Ina world where acting out like an entitled retard is rewarded, it probably is a “journalist” for the NYT.
Shire-man,
I listened to the recording: I don’t think she was a conservative troll.
She employed the standard tactic of the Far Left: yell at you belligerently that you are awful (a “ghoul” in this particular case for not aligning with the Far Left) in the desperate hope of bullying you into compliance.
In other words she expressed a purely emotional rant without any facts or substance whatsoever.
I suppose you could consider her a Far Left troll. That depends on your specific definition of a troll.
“She employed the standard tactic of the Far Left: yell at you belligerently that you are awful (a “ghoul” in this particular case for not aligning with the Far Left) in the desperate hope of bullying you into compliance.”
And guilt – Most important! :
“I have two questions. How do you sleep at night? And aren’t you just like a little bit worried that there might be a hell and when you meet God he will send you there?”
{Snip}
“You f@cking ghouls. I hope that there is a God in heaven so he judges you when you die.”
These are the people who are so proud of how accepting of others not like themselves that they are.
When in reality, they are as mentally-ill as my demented troll here in TTAG.
Right, little boy with shriveled genitalia? 😉
Well a quick search of her name reveals that the NYT has announced it’s ‘investigating’ her, so if they still give a whit about their reputation for objectivity (sarc), she’ll be looking for a new job soon.
They will fire her for being a distraction to the core mission of the NYT, expertly gas-lighting the Americans that read it.
When in reality, she just pulled off the mask the rest of them have on… 🙂
No. She’ll be “suspended indefinitely,” and then either quietly erased (if her articles never got much attention) or reinstated (if she raises enough of a #MeToo stink or if she’s a popular writer).
She’s very confused about sin.
To say the least. Coached by satan I’m thinking…
“She’s very confused about sin.”
Is that surprising?, you can only speak intelligently about a subject that you have studied in some depth.
‘Sin’ and ‘Hell’ are things she only speaks of mockingly… 😉
Calling this woman a “journalist” is a misnomer of the worst kind.
on both counts: “woman” and “journalist”
Nothing you can do when they’re rabid but put them down.
It can’t be both, Sweetie.
“Unhinged NYT journalist”
Kind of redundant.
RE: erim moralis “You f@cking ghouls. I hope that there is a God in heaven so that he judges you when you die.
The caller erim moralis has to hope there is a God in heaven. Either you know or you don’t. There is no gray area just like there is no gray area for Gun Control. Gun Control is not what you hope it is erim moralis. It is exactly what History Confirms it to be. Gun Control no matter its shape or form is an agenda that History Clearly Confirms is rooted in racism and genocide.
Just look at what Gun Control is doing to you erim…It’s making you use the phone to make a complete drama queen fool out of yourself. Nothing in that letter is not true…If it were you would have pointed out untruths.
Following such tragedies you know it’s the MO of the democRat Party to call for Gun Control before the dead and injured make it to the hospital. Don’t you think that’s about as ghoulish as ghoulish can get? It all boils down to simple arithmetic even you should understand…
1) The Second Amendment is one thing.
2) The criminal misuse of firearms, bricks, bats, knives, vehicles, etc. is another thing.
3) History Confirms Gun Control in any shape, matter or form is a racist and nazi based Thing.
“Again, I am from the New York Times and I’m letting everyone in the New York Times know what kind of f@cking a$$holes you are.”
Ohhhh noooo, now nobody at the NYT will like us. 😛
/S
Sounds like a terrorist threat to me. Hopefully they get the police involved. I’d say the FBI but they’re a joke.
I’m surprised she hasn’t strapped a bomb on yet and tried to blow up GLGR HQ.
She’s confused. She’s a paid propagandist. I haven’t seen evidence of actual “journalists” being employed by the New York Times for some time now.
The German Nazi’s thought God was on there side too.
She’s a “journalist” for the NY Times. Joe Biden drove a semi. Elizabeth Warren is related to Pocahontas. Alec Baldwin is married to a Hispanic woman named Hilarious. Hilary Clinton once landed in a helicopter under fire. James Madison University claimed that Kyle Rittenhouse was charged “with murdering and taking away two beautiful Black lives.” Brian Williams saw bodies floating down Bourbon Street and it wasn’t even Mardi Gras.
See a pattern here?
Bets on her being pro choice?
“I have two questions. How do you sleep at night? And aren’t you just like a little bit worried that there might be a hell and when you meet God he will send you there?
That’s just my only question.
Third question. The only people politicizing this seems to be you because you’re the only people I got a f@cking press release from. ”
two questions but its her only question but then a bonus round third question?
Do all so called “journalists” at the NYT have problems with numbers?
Another fat sow is unhinged – news at 11:00.
Seriously, she doesn’t even get close enough to a rational statement or thought to flirt with it.
Maybe I’ll dial some random numbers, and tell whoever answers that I don’t like them – and hang up. Such silliness would be more rational than her preposterous diatribe.
Yup,
Journalistic impartiality…
It’s not politicizing, Erin, when after every violent tragedy, the guns instead of the person and the person’s condition become the focus AND guaranteed Constitutional limitations on government are further eroded on law-abiding citizens. And to literally add insult to injury, the so-called new “gun control” laws introduced wouldn’t have affected the outcome of the criminal endeavor. So save your vulgarity for the criminal, not an organization out to protect OUR rights.
She seems…pleasant.
“She seems…pleasant.”
Typical Leftist Scum. Can you imagine what it’s like for the poor bastard that has to put up with her crap on a daily basis at home?
Just ask my mentally-disturbed deranged troll about the relationship he has with his mother… 😉
Her pool boy does whatever she tells him to.
RED FLAG! Confiscate all her electronics until she can prove she isn’t a danger to herself or others.
That voicemail message may put this fat sow in the running for a Pulitzer Prize.
Some where there is a gun owner named Jesus that’s softly laughing and thinking “My dad wants to talk with you Erin, but he’s patient and can wait until you get there to break the bad news to you.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/new-york-times-reviews-wirecutter-editor-erin-marquis-over-voicemail-for-gun-rights-group-after-michigan-shooting/ar-AARrCXb?ocid=uxbndlbing
about Erin Marquis … “The New York Times said Friday that it is reviewing a top editor at the newspaper’s Wirecutter.com for tweeting scathing messages about a gun-rights group, and for allegedly leaving angry, profane voicemails for the group.”
“That group on Friday asked on Twitter if the Times will “apologize and reprimand” Marquis for the voicemails it claims she left.
“We’re not surprised that an angry, liberal, anti-gun New York Times reporter would show their true colors and wish we’d burn in hell – we’re just glad she was actually foolish enough to leave two voicemails for us to laugh at, and then publish,” said Dudley Brown, president of the National Association for Gun Rights in a prepared statement.
Times spokeswoman Danielle Rhoades Ha, in an email to CNBC, said, “We expect our employees to behave in a way that is consistent with our values and commitment to the highest ethical standards.”
“We are currently reviewing this matter, which involves an employee of Wirecutter, our product recommendation site, who does not work in The New York Times newsroom,” the spokeswoman said.
Marquis declined to comment.”
On top of her unhinged phone calls and tweets, she kinda lied about being a “journalist with the New York Times”.
LoL 😂
She works at wirecutter. According to her bio; “Lead Editor @Wirecutter, Detroiter, cancer survivor, curator of empty Topo Chico bottles. Formerly @Jalopnik & Autoblog. @wirecutterunion secretary (she/her) ” – she was still at Jalopnik in July this year, looks like they fired her.
NY Transit has contacted her regarding a job she may ACTUALLY be qualified for.
They need someone to suck farts out of foam cushions.
HAhahahahahahaha!!!!
Oh man, that was good.
I have mixed feelings about what I am going to say but, people like this deranged, angry, ignorant, highly opinionated, frustrated, intolerant, (probably) mentally unstable individual make the case for why not everybody should own firearms. But Hey, who am I to decide? She has the same rights to own guns. She is also the reason why I am keeping my gun collection.
Manny,
I was going to post something along those lines, but you did it better than I.
Hat tip to you!
Another angry Liberal like Whoopi Goldberg. Just smile at them. It pisses them off to see you are a happy person.
As a Christian who takes following the Bible seriously, I see a God-mandated responsibility as a man to protect my wife and children.
The problem is this journalist is making a god after her own image, which is idolatry. Hopefully, she repents of this behavior and comes to know the true God before it is too late.
So yeah this is what you get when your newspaper gets taken over by personality disordered whackos who hire more personality disordered whackos and drive all the normal people out.
Maybe you can go make me a sammich to calm yourself down.
Leftists are so stupid that they have no idea how stupid they are. This girl has never thought about whether people are really safer when only the criminals have guns.
Like hmmm, they could even shoot up a school if they want and there would be nobody to defend the kids until police arrive 5 or 10 or 15 minutes later.
But none of their friends have ever thought about that either, and even when that very thing just happened they haven’t got the IQ to comprehend what is in front of their eyes.
She counts about as well as Buzz in the first ‘Home Alone’ movie.
Well, I run a CPAP, keep the room dark, get in bed without screens by 9, and empower people who would otherwise be victims, so I get some of the best quality sleep you’ve ever heard of.
How’s your sleep?
If a gun rights group can prompt a New York Times employee (they’re not journalists) to give this kind of honest and open reaction instead of their usual slick lies they must be doing something right.
Tolerant left.
Where do they get their help…..halfway houses??
I can only imagine the horror of having to wake up next to something like that each morning. Suicide would definitely be an option.
I’m glad this left wing atheist feels comfortable enough to leave her opinion about religion on someone’s answering machine. When given the opportunity they will let their guard down and say what they really believe.
I’m sure this woman lives far away from the violence and gunfire that poor people have to put up with. Since the poor are not allowed to have guns in New York City.
Comments are closed.