Ukrainian President Volodimir Zelenski.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s visit to the Scranton Army Ammunition Plant in Pennsylvania earlier this week has drawn criticism for what some are calling an overt political move favoring Democrats. According to ABC News, Zelensky toured the facility under tight security to thank workers for producing 155mm artillery shells, which have been crucial in Ukraine’s defense against Russian aggression. Zelensky expressed his gratitude, stating that “the democratic world can prevail” thanks to such efforts. The visit, however, has sparked controversy for its timing and political undertones.

Zelensky’s visit, which also included Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and Democratic Senator Bob Casey, appeared more like a campaign stop in a key battleground state. As Real Clear Politics reported, Zelensky even autographed a 155mm shell before handing the pen to Shapiro and Casey for their own signatures, an image that was widely circulated and viewed as favorable to the Democratic Party. The Ukrainian leader’s presence alongside prominent Democratic figures just days before his meetings with President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris has raised eyebrows, particularly among Republicans.

Further fueling the controversy, Zelensky criticized former President Donald Trump and his running mate, Ohio Senator J.D. Vance, in a recent interview with the New Yorker, reported by Real Clear Politics. He called Vance “dangerous” and “too radical,” and questioned Trump’s ability to end the war in Ukraine. This has prompted accusations that Zelensky is meddling in U.S. politics, despite his assertion that doing so “would be wrong.”

Critics like National Reviews Michael Brendan Dougherty argued that Zelensky’s alignment with Democrats could damage future American support for Ukraine, especially if Republicans take control of the Senate or the White House in 2024. Dougherty noted that by appearing with Democratic leaders and attacking the Republican ticket, Zelensky is “deliberately contributing to the political polarization” of an issue that should remain bipartisan. He warned that such actions could undermine Ukraine’s cause among Republicans, risking future aid.

The National Review piece also highlighted the growing concern among Republicans about the continued U.S. financial and military support for Ukraine. Zelensky’s visit to the ammunition plant, a facility essential to producing munitions for Ukraine, has added fuel to the debate over the country’s involvement in the war.

Meanwhile, the NRA weighed in on the broader context, with Randy Kozuch, Executive Director of the NRA Institute for Legislative Action, releasing a statement critical of the Biden administration’s focus on gun control and military aid abroad while crime increases domestically. Kozuch suggested that this focus is distracting from addressing issues closer to home, a sentiment echoed by some Americans who oppose continued spending on Ukraine’s war effort.

With the war in Ukraine now in its third year, Zelensky’s involvement in American political debates may have long-lasting repercussions for U.S. policy toward the conflict. For now, his recent actions have cemented his position as a polarizing figure in U.S. politics, particularly as the 2024 election approaches. It seems he’s hedging his bets on the Democrats winning across the board to maintain support from the U.S. If they don’t, and the GOP maintains control of the House, and at the very least gains control of the Senate and/or the White House, which the Senate at least seems likely, Zelensky may have just put his country in a worse position than it already was.

12 COMMENTS

  1. They have to keep the war going. If someone comes in and makes a peace deal, people will rightly ask why that wasn’t done in the first place. Instead of trying to make a peace deal, they sent Kamala to Europe right before the invasion. Putin said they wanted assurances that Ukraine would stay out of NATO. So what did Kamala say right before the invasion? Ukraine should join NATO. It was an intentional provocation. Now we have 100s of thousands of dead Ukrainians, the destruction of homes and infrastructure, and a massive exodus with no end in sight. The country will never be the same. But a select few will be making bank. Then we get to rebuild it for them. Thanks Kamala!

    Zelensky expressed his gratitude, stating that “the democratic world can prevail” thanks to such efforts.

    By “democratic world” I assume he means Democrat Party supporters. Ukraine isn’t a democracy. In addition to being known as the most corrupt country in Europe, Zelensky refused to hold elections. He has punished his political rivals, including imprisoning and killing (yes, really) an American citizen! Zelensky is a textbook tyrant. Of course democrats love him.

    • Dude,

      You have it exactly. Add to the provocations: 10 years of Ukraine and NATO violating the Minsk Accords;
      the USA operating 16 bio-weapons labs (Victoria Nuland admitted to 16; there were more) near the border with Russia; and the Ukranian violent repression of ethnic Russians.

      NATO is using Ukraine to fight a proxy war with Russia. Why? Because without Russia, NATO would have no reason to exist. They fan the flame of war because that is how NATO justifies its existance and how their sponsors, the arms makers, get rich.

      China is a far greater threat to world peace.

      If Putin ramps up to put a quick end to Ukraine, NATO will step-in openly and directly.

  2. He’s shilling for war-mongering, nation-building, export-our-values-at-gunpoint, neocons. It just happens that most Democrats are neocons now.

    • Reverse the order of subjects in that last sentence and change now to always were. Uniparty is a stone bitch to deal with.

  3. A lot of American troops were in Russian hands at the end of WW1. A lot of them are still missing.

    Russia, good neighbor, NOT…

    Historically, what good has ever come to America from acquiescing to Russian aggression? Serious question…

  4. I’ve been reading articles trying to understand the situation in Ukraine. It seems war mongers like Nuland want this to continue with what end goal? Weakening Russia and “saving democracy” is the usual drivel but I’m afraid the result will be all out devastation for every country involved. This election can’t come soon enough for me. May God help US.

    • Based off absolutely nothing but tinfoil I would guess a few things are at play.

      Money, someone somewhere is making a lot of it and is very invested in this situation continuing.

      Training, lot of new tech/tactics/and ideas being tested out and confirmed/disproven some of which have been around untried since the cold war.

      Thinning the herd, Russia has a golden opportunity to cut down on it’s prison population and undesirables and it wouldn’t be the first time they did so.

      Networking, Iran China, North Korea and others get to solidify a alternative market independent of the US/Dollar and take advantage of the chaos at Russia’s expense to further their own goals while others are distracted or busy.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here